Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

H2O Man

(77,373 posts)
10. Not happening.
Mon Jul 14, 2025, 05:46 PM
Jul 14

She is appealing her conviction. She needs to show that her constitutional rights were violated, that there was misconduct on the prosecutor's part, or that the is startling new evidence proving her to be innocent. Zero chance there.

Who and why would she be called to testify against? The felon & maga administration sought to tie the Democratic Party to Epstein by releasing selective files they were convinced existed. But they don't. Surprise, surprise! Epstein is not a dead chicken that a farmer could hang around the party's neck. So who would she testify against?

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

A person who traffics minor children to the rich cannot be trusted to tell the truth. Irish_Dem Jul 14 #1
Doesn't matter if she is viewed as being credible newdeal2 Jul 14 #6
Knowing everything and telling everything are two different things tinrobot Jul 14 #20
Yes she knows all the details. This is not the issue. Irish_Dem Jul 14 #21
I agree WiVoter Jul 14 #15
I believe, absolutely not, the false story and documents are being drafted as we speak Eliot Rosewater Jul 14 #2
What about Julie Brown? johnnyfins Jul 14 #14
She will be called a liar by the maga idiots Eliot Rosewater Jul 14 #16
🙄😖🤐 Wiz Imp Jul 14 #28
Yup, The Ol Deny, Deflect & Destroy Trick WiVoter Jul 14 #17
Exactly awesomerwb1 Jul 14 #22
Always Eliot Rosewater Jul 14 #25
Let me add a separate comment, we will know if it's the truth Eliot Rosewater Jul 14 #3
Where is her little black book? MrWowWow Jul 14 #4
Of course she isn't reliable. RockRaven Jul 14 #5
First order of business when Democrats regain control of the House in '26: Epstein Hearings. sop Jul 14 #7
Absolutely WiVoter Jul 14 #18
What if Melania begins to talk Beachnutt Jul 14 #8
No, but... Mike 03 Jul 14 #9
"As long as she has anything to gain by lying, she cannot be trusted." TheProle Jul 14 #13
Not happening. H2O Man Jul 14 #10
She's a nasty piece of work and you might not want to trust her word, but Ocelot II Jul 14 #11
He's not going to pardon her. Not with the way MAGA is reacting. Not gonna happen. tulipsandroses Jul 14 #12
Not my circus. Not my monkeys. Torchlight Jul 14 #19
Traitor already told the world he's on a fabricated list made up by Obama Arazi Jul 14 #23
I think she'd see her only hope to survive is to protect Trump. blm Jul 14 #24
Ah nope. a kennedy Jul 14 #26
As a juror I would need to see what she said backed up by documents dsc Jul 14 #27
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If Maxwell Is Willing To ...»Reply #10