Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

unblock

(55,575 posts)
Fri Jun 27, 2025, 04:42 PM Jun 27

Seems clear to me it's not "mass deportation" [View all]

It's ethnic cleansing.

They are (ab-)using deportation laws and procedures to implement part of a larger ethnic cleansing program but it seems clear that the real point is ethnic cleansing.

The willingness to sweep up citizens in the process, the complete disregard for families, jobs, industries, contributions to the community, length of time in America, and eagerness to send them to irrelevant countries, and possible torture and imprisonment for the crime of wanting to come to America and failing to stand in line still out paperwork, it all makes sense if it's ethnic cleansing.

I don't think I really have to work hard to convince anyone here that there's obvious bigotry behind it. But the term deportation, even mass deportation, doesn't convey the proper degree of evil involved. They're deporting people who have been here for decades, worked productively, committed no crimes, all because their parents didn't follow the rules when they came here. There's no public interest or policy that makes any sense that says this is a good thing; it only adds up if you've decided to get rid of a whole class of people.

Deportation can be a legitimate process, used sparingly and judiciously after due process. Even mass deportation merely conveys volume.

"Ethnic cleansing" conveys what's really going on. Sure, a few immigrants from Europe might get caught up in the sweep, but the obvious focus is on people from Spanish-speaking countries, and they're just using the tools available to get rid of "those people".

22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Try the term "remigration" DBoon Jun 27 #1
That covers most of it, though not the imprisonment and torture or slavery involving "third countries" unblock Jun 27 #2
Given the obvious racism, why did so many Hispanics vote for him? surfered Jun 27 #3
Why did *anyone* vote for him? unblock Jun 27 #4
The wealthy always want more. The thing of paying the politician more so they would not accept bribes will LiberalArkie Jun 27 #14
The greed never stops with them, sure. It's how they became billionaires in the first place unblock Jun 27 #15
Stability. Something every billionaire and every business type wants. They ain't getting any of that. paleotn Jun 27 #18
Exactly what it is. orangecrush Jun 27 #5
And if they sweep up a few born-in-the-USA citizens, even a few white ones --- that's the price of war erronis Jun 27 #6
The Replacement Therory has them worried Ohioboy Jun 27 #7
It became an emergency situation for them when they couldn't prevent a black man from becoming president. unblock Jun 27 #11
Yup, they grab people who follow all the rules and haven't committed any crimes IronLionZion Jun 27 #8
VERY obvious Skittles Jun 27 #9
History Iamscrewed Jun 27 #10
This IS all Stephen Miller's brainchild, so... Karasu Jun 27 #12
In The US Mr.Bee Jun 27 #13
It's 1933 Germany (or 1935 Italy), and we already know how that turned out FakeNoose Jun 27 #16
? Not sure what you mean by that. Mussolini came to power in 1923, ten years before the Nazis JHB Jun 27 #20
It's also torture BaronChocula Jun 27 #17
Yup SSJVegeta Jun 27 #19
Yes, and too bad for those who voted for the Treasonous Asshole. Cha Jun 27 #21
Indeed. Ethnic cleansing summarizes it concisely. WestMichRad Jun 27 #22
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Seems clear to me it's no...