Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The trump DOJ is stalling providing information to trial judge about steps to facilitate the release Mr. Garcia [View all]mahatmakanejeeves
(71,303 posts)5. Kilmar Abrego Garcia's lawyers blast DOJ's request this morning to move all of this into mid-next week.
Chris Geidner
@chrisgeidner.bsky.social
Follow
Kilmar Abrego Garcia's lawyers appropriately, imho blast DOJ's request this morning to move all of this into mid-next week.
Chris Geidner @chrisgeidner.bsky.social
·
1m
At the same time, Kilmar Abrego Garcia's lawyers have already responded, calling this morning's actions by the government "another stunning display of arrogance and cruelty." They "vigorously oppose" the extension request and will be at the 1p hearing. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
This Courts order to facilitate Abrego Garcias return was issued one week ago. It was
not stayed until Monday afternoon. Accordingly, the Government should have been taking actions
Friday, Saturday, Sunday, and Monday morning, and the Government can report on those. The
Case 8:25-cv-00951-PX Document 54 Filed 04/11/25 Page 1 of 2
2
Supreme Court lifted the stay yesterday evening. Accordingly, the Government should have been
taking actions last night and this morning, and it can report on those. The Government should
likewise be in a position to tell the Court in general terms what its further plan is to facilitate Mr.
Abrego Garcias return, and who in the Government is responsible for implementing that plan.
ALT
Instead, the Government continues to delay, obfuscate, and flout court orders, while a
mans life and safety is at risk. Its request for an extensionfiled this morning in defiance of the
Courts rules requiring consultation with Plaintiffs counselis another stunning display of
arrogance and cruelty. It did not take that time to ponder whether to remove Garciawhich it
effectuated within 72 hours of his unlawful seizureand it does not need that time to comply with
this Courts and the Supreme Courts rulings. We vigorously oppose the Governments motion,
and we further request that the Government immediately report on Mr. Abrego Garcias safety and
well being. We will attend the scheduled hearing at 1 p.m.
Dated: April 11, 2025 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP
ALT
April 11, 2025 at 10:33 AM
@chrisgeidner.bsky.social
Follow
Kilmar Abrego Garcia's lawyers appropriately, imho blast DOJ's request this morning to move all of this into mid-next week.
Chris Geidner @chrisgeidner.bsky.social
·
1m
At the same time, Kilmar Abrego Garcia's lawyers have already responded, calling this morning's actions by the government "another stunning display of arrogance and cruelty." They "vigorously oppose" the extension request and will be at the 1p hearing. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
This Courts order to facilitate Abrego Garcias return was issued one week ago. It was
not stayed until Monday afternoon. Accordingly, the Government should have been taking actions
Friday, Saturday, Sunday, and Monday morning, and the Government can report on those. The
Case 8:25-cv-00951-PX Document 54 Filed 04/11/25 Page 1 of 2
2
Supreme Court lifted the stay yesterday evening. Accordingly, the Government should have been
taking actions last night and this morning, and it can report on those. The Government should
likewise be in a position to tell the Court in general terms what its further plan is to facilitate Mr.
Abrego Garcias return, and who in the Government is responsible for implementing that plan.
ALT
Instead, the Government continues to delay, obfuscate, and flout court orders, while a
mans life and safety is at risk. Its request for an extensionfiled this morning in defiance of the
Courts rules requiring consultation with Plaintiffs counselis another stunning display of
arrogance and cruelty. It did not take that time to ponder whether to remove Garciawhich it
effectuated within 72 hours of his unlawful seizureand it does not need that time to comply with
this Courts and the Supreme Courts rulings. We vigorously oppose the Governments motion,
and we further request that the Government immediately report on Mr. Abrego Garcias safety and
well being. We will attend the scheduled hearing at 1 p.m.
Dated: April 11, 2025 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP
ALT
April 11, 2025 at 10:33 AM
Kilmar Abrego Garcia's lawyers â appropriately, imho â blast DOJ's request this morning to move all of this into mid-next week.
— Chris Geidner (@chrisgeidner.bsky.social) 2025-04-11T14:33:19.476Z
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
28 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The trump DOJ is stalling providing information to trial judge about steps to facilitate the release Mr. Garcia [View all]
LetMyPeopleVote
Apr 2025
OP
They are using them as an example for everyone else. That's why they are particularly cruel.
Baitball Blogger
Apr 2025
#8
Kilmar Abrego Garcia's lawyers blast DOJ's request this morning to move all of this into mid-next week.
mahatmakanejeeves
Apr 2025
#5
Garcia's atty needs to get in touch with "Big Balls" -- Musk's Blitzkrieg expert.
allegorical oracle
Apr 2025
#7
JUST IN: Judge Xinis *grants* the government a partial extension ... to 11:30 AM. https://
LetMyPeopleVote
Apr 2025
#11
BREAKING: DOJ says it won't comply with Judge Xinis' order because the deadline she set is "impracticable."
LetMyPeopleVote
Apr 2025
#18
Summon the DOJ lawyers to the courtroom. Have them taken into custody for contempt.
Efilroft Sul
Apr 2025
#19
DOJ's position ignores Xinis' request for information about steps that the administraiton has already taken
LetMyPeopleVote
Apr 2025
#21
NEW: Trump admin balks at court order after SCOTUS order in Abrego Garcia case.
mahatmakanejeeves
Apr 2025
#22
DOJ lawyer tells judge he doesn't know whereabouts of mistakenly deported Maryland man
LetMyPeopleVote
Apr 2025
#24
Judge demands 'daily updates' on whether Trump admin is complying with court order to return illegally deported man
LetMyPeopleVote
Apr 2025
#25
NEW from a federal judge in Maryland immigrant Kilmar Abrego Garcia's case:
LetMyPeopleVote
Apr 2025
#28