Nobody is better at being human, Professor Dawkins, least of all you

[AtheistCrusader]

21. Well, what I was trying to drive at is:

Would it be morally acceptable to intentionally conceive and bring to term a Down Syndrome child. Meaning, to, as I said earlier, game the system to produce that result, as the opposite of Dawkins' exhortation to game the system in the opposite way. Does it reveal a moral underpinning one way or the other?


I would guess that most people might find that a problem, but they might not be able to articulate exactly why.

Because that was the heart of his suggestion or the 'what', moral implications aside, that a prospective mother should, in his opinion, abort and try again. (Because this is a division/copy error, not a genetic artifact.) Separate from his claim of 'why', in this case, that he says it is immoral.