Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
History of Feminism
In reply to the discussion: Have an issue with rape? [View all]BainsBane
(56,184 posts)15. That book has now taking on Biblical proportions
complete with Papal infallibility. It's unreal. All dissent must be silenced. They've got a talking point down they are repeatedly incessantly.
Regardless of the post:
"You can't critique a book if you don't read it."
I wasn't critiquing the book. I was talking about x, y and z.
"You can't critique a book if you don't read it."
I didn't. This thread is not about the book.
"You're trying to critique a book you didn't read."
on and on.
Imagine if they exercised that level of discipline while lobbying for a cause other than trying to make people they disagree with keep quiet?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
42 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

I think that is where the hatred of sea comes from. She doesn't hold back her opinion, and
Squinch
Jul 2014
#5
very astute observation of what is happening on this board in regards to seabeyond.
Tuesday Afternoon
Jul 2014
#27
I think there is a connection to the fact that this is a critique of an entertainment media
el_bryanto
Jul 2014
#6
I don't agree with those who say that this is a frivolous discussion, even if the subject book is
Squinch
Jul 2014
#7
I think I've identified a major area of contention. Obviously I haven't read all the posts
Flatulo
Jul 2014
#23
I would actually disagree with you. I don't see much criticising of BDSM. What I am seeing on that
Squinch
Jul 2014
#31
I've seen the claims of consent vigorously debated. Again, I haven't read the book, so I
Flatulo
Jul 2014
#35
I have no interest in sex that hurts or humiliates either, but I understand that there are many
Squinch
Jul 2014
#37
Yep. The sacred right to fresher and nastier wank material supersedes all.
Sheldon Cooper
Jul 2014
#36
I have seen your point about Rush Limbaugh etc pointed out in some of these threads. No one
Squinch
Jul 2014
#33
And those making the "you can't critique if you don't read it" comment haven't read it either.
Squinch
Jul 2014
#34
What a lot of people don't seem to understand is that these are Libertarian arguments....
YoungDemCA
Jul 2014
#17
"reactionary right-wing bullshit masquerading as enlightened independent thinking"
nomorenomore08
Jul 2014
#38
Deriding the books as "shitty" is an excuse to not assign any importance to them.
kickitup
Jul 2014
#42
I see this "criticism = censorship" bullshit and I can't believe people are that simpleminded.
nomorenomore08
Jul 2014
#39