Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
7. what is a hoot with all this? i listen to men define masculinity and it is never exclusively man.
Thu Apr 17, 2014, 08:53 AM
Apr 2014

it is not a definition of man. it is always merely human condition.

brave/courage. like a woman cannot and is not brave.

strong. maybe a a physical to an extent as a whole denying individuality, but strength beyond physical, women too are all over it.

what character that is man, .... is exclusively his?

since there is non. since they lost the superiority in brain power, ability to do finance and control money at home, and all the other "male" characters that were about controlling and dominating women, the only one i see now is the.... ever so awesome erection. a sexual control and dominance. hence masculinities sole definition is in his sexuality and women being the servers and providers... providers, see that, and womens sexuality ignored and invisible.

that is the only myth of male dominance left to destroy.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»History of Feminism»So I found this website &...»Reply #7