Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Football

In reply to the discussion: Pats 37, Rams 17 [View all]

JonLP24

(29,462 posts)
9. I don't think it is a sham
Sun Feb 3, 2019, 05:08 PM
Feb 2019

Rams should have been rewarded with facemask call before the Saints possession facing a 1st & goal at the one likely scoring a TD going up by 4 forcing New Orleans to go for more than 3 which they settled for softer the no call plus Rams had to make a 57 yarder to just make it here. Rams were top 3 in the league in yards per pass attempt and fourth in rushing attempts per game right behind New England. Rams pass defense isn't great but Aqib Talib has familiarity against New England as well as well as with them as well.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Pats 37, Rams 17 [View all] Blarneyman Feb 2019 OP
I like your numbers CentralMass Feb 2019 #1
This is the first time in years I won't be watching blur256 Feb 2019 #2
Refs were bought out... Maxheader Feb 2019 #6
No kidding blur256 Feb 2019 #7
Meteor 1 Rams 0 Pats 0 Moostache Feb 2019 #3
I'll watch because that's what I do. mountain grammy Feb 2019 #4
Rams 31 PAts 28 - Wade Phillip's defense give Brady fits! walkingman Feb 2019 #5
Pats 31-21. Croney Feb 2019 #8
I don't think it is a sham JonLP24 Feb 2019 #9
Ok, I picked the Pats by 10 (31-21) and they won by 10. Croney Feb 2019 #10
Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Football»Pats 37, Rams 17»Reply #9