Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Exercise and Fitness

Showing Original Post only (View all)

ZenLefty

(20,924 posts)
Wed Feb 8, 2012, 11:59 AM Feb 2012

NYT: Does Foot Form Explain Running Injuries? [View all]

Does Foot Form Explain Running Injuries?

All of the Harvard runners wore shoes, and most, as Dr. Lieberman says, “wore different shoes every day of the week.” Some ran in well-cushioned shoes and became injured, while others did not. Likewise for those who usually ran in minimal racing flats. Some got hurt; some did not. And forefoot striking, over all, was not a panacea. Many of the forefoot strikers were felled by injuries.

But in general, those runners who landed on their heels were considerably more likely to get hurt, often multiple times during a year.


Not a huge study and hardly surprising results. I know that I make an effort not to heel strike; I have strong calves and it feels better to land and launch from the ball of my foot. Heel striking puts all the load on my knees and hip joints, which feels about as good as a sledgehammer driving a 1/2" rebar into my femur. I don't run frequently, but since I started making that effort I have been largely injury and pain free from running.



1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
interesting eShirl Feb 2012 #1
Latest Discussions»Support Forums»Exercise and Fitness»NYT: Does Foot Form Expl...»Reply #0