5 Conspiracy Theories That Are Shockingly Easy to Debunk

[ocpagu]

1. Are you serious?

This is garbage. Really. You can do better. Some DUers are more qualified than the author of this garbage to present more reasonable "debunk".

His "debunking" of the controversy regarding JFK assassination is laughable. The fact that the diagram is wrong doesn't mean anything. Doesn't prove Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone. Doesn't explain the injury in the back of Kennedy's head. He didn't debunk anything.

The "debunking" of Pearl Harbor contoversy is even more pathetic. I mean, any elementary school history teacher would laugh of this explanation. The fact that the Tripartite Pact was only defensive doesn't mean the US didn't know about the attacks and much less the US could not use this attack to get involved in the war. Again, he didn't debuk anything.

To "debunk" theories about WTC the author would have to offer an answer to ALL topics that are questioned. He's not saying anything here. He's not debunking anything. He didn't even mention WTC7... how can he be "debunking" anything if he's not even referring to the real controversies in first place?

Well, it's easy to claim to be debunking something. The difficult part is to really debunk something. The author of your article failed miserably at his attempt. This reads like a school pamphlet, something written by a teenager...