Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Israel/Palestine

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

shira

(30,109 posts)
Fri Sep 16, 2016, 07:53 AM Sep 2016

Anti-Israel ‘Double Standard’ at the UN: Why No Condemnation of Other Occupations and Settlements? [View all]

...It is Article 49(6) of the Geneva Conventions that is most often cited in international condemnation of Israeli policies. That article states that an “Occupying Power shall not deport or transfer parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies.”

Yet while Israel has been reminded in condemnatory U.N. resolutions of its obligations under the Geneva Conventions about 500 times since 1967, Kontorovich found, in all other seven cases that had occurred a total of just two times.

In fact, the study found that no U.N. body has ever invoked Article 49(6) specifically in relation to any of the seven other cases.

And in all seven of those cases, settlement activity has taken place – often on a larger scale than in the Israel/Palestinian case, and involving “far-reaching demographic and economic consequences for the occupied population,” the study found.


more...
http://cnsnews.com/news/article/patrick-goodenough/anti-israel-double-standard-un-why-no-condemnation-other-occupations

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Israel/Palestine»Anti-Israel ‘Double Stand...»Reply #0