Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NNadir

(38,936 posts)
6. The Savannah River, Hanford, Rocky Flats, etc. garner a lot of attention.
Sun Jul 5, 2026, 06:58 AM
Sunday

The assumption underlying all of this attention is that the death toll associated with exposure to radiation is enormous, that radiation deaths are very common.

They aren't.

Savannah River, Hanford, Rocky Flats, etc. have been there for decades and are now, because of decay, less radioactive then they were when they operated.

If we paid as much attention to the deaths from extreme heat exposure as we do to trivial radiation exposure, we would have brains.

But we don't have brains, we don't even fear fear itself. We revel in fear.

Some years back, a tiresome antinuke fool carried on around here about the collapse of a tunnel that collapsed at Hanford in which some old rail cars on which abandoned plutonium isolation reactors had been stored.

It inspired me to look into the matter in way too much detail given that there is no evidence that there are many antinukes who demonstrate familiarity with the contents of science books, whereupon, in writing it, I explored the interesting geochemistry of radionuclides, for my own benefit anyway, assuredly not for the benefit of the antinuke in question.

My ruminations on the topic are here: 828 Underground Nuclear Tests, Plutonium Migration in Nevada, Dunning, Kruger, Strawmen, and Tunnels

Over the years, I've come across many papers on the Savannah River site. It's an interesting case on the geochemistry of radionuclides but it is not decidedly a disaster on the scale of Chornobyl - the big boogeyman of antinukist cults - and Chornobyl is a trivial matter when compared to the collapse of the planetary atmosphere. What Chornobyl is really is an interesting unintentional laboratory on radiobiology, but not a tragedy on the scale of the bombing of Kiev funded by German antinukes who bought fossil fuels from Putin because they were so fucking scared of radiation from Chornobyl.

Yesterday in New Jersey, where I live, people were killed by extreme heat. To my mind, they were killed by irrational fear of radioactive materials, which for 80 years have been whipped up by illiterate journalists.

I didn't watch the video in the OP, and I won't. I've been exposed to this radiation paranoid ignorance my whole damned life. The elevation of fear of radiation is more deadly than radiation itself and it's driven by journalists, the same "journalists" who put an orange pedophile in the White House.

These kinds of "exposes" by journalists inspire my more serious than not "joke" that one cannot get a degree in journalism if one has passed a college level science course with a grade of C or better.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»America's Most TOXIC Site...»Reply #6