Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Environment & Energy

Showing Original Post only (View all)

hatrack

(62,166 posts)
Thu Jul 18, 2024, 09:42 AM Jul 2024

Young Republican Environmentalists Disappointed By Complete Absence Of Climate From GQP Platform [View all]


EDIT

It is difficult to predict how these and other decisions could affect the level of carbon emissions in Earth’s atmosphere, the main driver of global warming. But a recent analysis by Carbon Brief, a United Kingdom-based climate policy and science publication, found that a Trump win in November could cause an additional 4 billion metric tons of carbon emissions by 2030 — equivalent to the combined annual emissions of the European Union and Japan.

“A Republican sweep in November’s election would avoid congressional roadblocks to Trump rolling back all of Biden’s climate legacy,” Simon Evans, deputy editor and senior policy editor at Carbon Brief, said in an email. “Under those conditions, Trump could push the U.S. towards the extra 4 billion tons of CO2 emissions by 2030 that we modeled — and potentially beyond.”

At the Republican National Convention in Milwaukee on Monday, the party formally adopted a platform that makes no mention of climate change. Instead, it proclaims that America should “DRILL, BABY, DRILL,” referring to oil and gas as “liquid gold under our feet.” By contrast, the draft Democratic Party platform mentions “climate” or “clean energy” 141 times, including in a seven-page chapter devoted to climate solutions, according to an analysis by the environmental group Evergreen Action.

Some Republicans who have pushed their party to accept climate change criticized the platform for neglecting the issue. “I would have liked to see at least a mention of the Republican legacy of environmental stewardship and conversation,” said Chris Barnard, president of American Conservation Coalition Action, a group of young Republicans who support climate action. Barnard noted that polls consistently show climate change ranks as a top concern for younger Republican voters. The party ignores the issue, he said, at its own peril. “Our message to Republicans continues to be that they can’t just be saying ‘drill, baby, drill,’” he said.

EDIT

Ed. - Yes, Chris, and people in Hell would like to see ice water. WTF is WRONG with you?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-environment/2024/07/18/republican-election-sweep-climate-policy/
16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Young Republican Environm...»Reply #0