Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

nicosgramsci

(1 post)
2. These terms have a meaning though..
Tue Aug 6, 2013, 11:56 PM
Aug 2013

If socialism truly existed (China and the USSR is and was not "socialism&quot , greed wouldn't matter or exist. It comes down to eliminating the capital-labor relationship *and* abolishing private property (in other words, using property as a *social relationship* whereas one can exploit another). Personal property (a relationship between a person and a thing) is fine. Fundamentally, this is socialism. Capitalism, on the other hand, not only breeds greed, but thrives off it. Inherently, it is a system that allows for widespread exploitation.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Capitalism or Socialism? jimmyolsenblues May 2013 #1
These terms have a meaning though.. nicosgramsci Aug 2013 #2
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Poverty»The Insidiousness of Unch...»Reply #2