Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

FBaggins

(28,083 posts)
2. The problem here is that there isn't a "law" to ignore
Fri Jan 5, 2018, 02:51 PM
Jan 2018

The Obama administration was never successful in getting Congress to pass net neutrality legislation... so they tried to address the issue within the existing regulatory framework (essentially by declaring ISPs to be telephone networks so that their existing authority would cover them. Unfortunately (though probably predictably), that didn't pass muster with the courts. They tried again a couple years ago with a similar declaration that they hoped would pass court muster... but I think that was still an open question when the current administration decided to change the regulations.

As we're learning with so many other regulations, it's better to seek an act of Congress rather than trying to enact policy through regulatory authority... because such decisions can be undone by the next administration without having to go through Congress (where this probably wouldn't pass).

I wouldn't call this an example of "dictatorship" though... since that would mean that the last Administration was also such.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Help & Search»Computer Help and Support»FCC releases final net ne...»Reply #2