Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Virginia

Showing Original Post only (View all)

mahatmakanejeeves

(64,322 posts)
Mon May 13, 2024, 08:41 AM May 2024

Virginia judge to decide whether state law considers embryos as property [View all]

Hat tip, FFXnow

COUNTYWIDE, NEWS
Morning Notes
FFXnow.com Today at 8:15am

Local Judge to Decide If Embryos Can Be Property — “A trial is underway in Virginia that will determine whether state law allows frozen embryos to be considered property that can be divided up and assigned a monetary value. Fairfax County Circuit Court Judge Dontae Bugg heard arguments Thursday from a divorced couple who disagree over the ex-wife’s desire to use two embryos that they created when they were married.” [NBC4]

FAIRFAX COUNTY
Virginia judge to decide whether state law considers embryos as property

By Matthew Barakat • Published May 9, 2024 • Updated on May 9, 2024 at 10:51 pm

A trial is underway in Virginia that will determine whether state law allows frozen embryos to be considered property that can be divided up and assigned a monetary value. ... Fairfax County Circuit Court Judge Dontae Bugg heard arguments Thursday from a divorced couple who disagree over the ex-wife's desire to use two embryos that they created when they were married.

Honeyhline Heidemann says the embryos are her last chance to conceive a biological child after a cancer treatment left her infertile. Jason Heidemann, says he does not want to be forced to become a biological father to another child.

The case attracted national attention last year when a different judge, Richard Gardiner, ruled that embryos could be considered “goods or chattel” that could be divided under state law, and his analysis relied in part on a 19th-century law governing the treatment of slaves.

Gardiner is no longer assigned to the case, for reasons unrelated to his citation of slavery as a precedent.

{snip}

Copyright AP - Associated Press
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The sick thing about it all... Bluethroughu May 2024 #1
Of course they will. They already consider MOMFUDSKI May 2024 #2
And idiots JustAnotherGen May 2024 #3
Republicans Stealing Your Baby LetMyPeopleVote May 2024 #4
Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Virginia»Virginia judge to decide ...»Reply #0