Minnesota

exboyfil

(18,192 posts)

7. 270towin has not assigned NH (so it is a toss up)

Mon Oct 24, 2016, 02:58 PM

Oct 2016

This map does not address the 2 Congressional toss ups (ME and NE).

The two maps flip between undecided and Clinton for MN and WI which both happen to have the same number of electoral votes (10).

I think if both maps used the criteria they assigned prior to the election in 2012, Clinton would probably already be at 300+. They have to maintain some aspect of horse race. You cannot toss up WI and MN and assign CO, PA, NH in my mind. Either all five are toss ups or all five are Clinton.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Why is Minnesota now considered a "toss-up" state? [View all] question everything Oct 2016 OP

Benchmark has Minnesota BLUE. misterhighwasted Oct 2016 #1

They must have been trying to make Trump feel better Angry Dragon Oct 2016 #2

It isn't. There was a recent kSTP poll favoring Trump, but The Velveteen Ocelot Oct 2016 #3

For some reason 270towin exboyfil Oct 2016 #4

This is their map question everything Oct 2016 #5

270towin has not assigned NH (so it is a toss up) exboyfil Oct 2016 #7

538 has it Clinton's chances of winning MN at 85.2% geardaddy Oct 2016 #6

Apparently Trump is polling well in the Iron Range BainsBane Oct 2016 #8

That's sad. I remember after the 2012 elections the iron range was such a large blue spce question everything Oct 2016 #9

Just posted on the Strib's website tonight: dflprincess Oct 2016 #10

Still distrubing, statewise question everything Oct 2016 #11

Little recent polling GopherGal Oct 2016 #12