Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Kid Berwyn

(25,320 posts)
23. Project 2025 is MAGA for Urinary Executive (Trickle Down Forever)
Thu Jun 11, 2026, 11:52 AM
9 hrs ago

Greasy turd Russell Vought is up on the thing. Per Joyce White Vance:

Project 2025: It's On (Predictably)

Before Bill Barr became Donald Trump’s third attorney general, he circulated a memo that was more or less an audition tape for the job he ultimately got. That memo reached both the White House Counsel’s Office and Main Justice. In it, Barr argued in favor of what had previously been a fringe theory of a powerful “unitary executive,” in other words, a president able to consolidate power at the expense of the other two branches as a very powerful leader. The writing was on the wall with Barr’s selection, although the Supreme Court cast it in stone when the conservative majority signed off on the view that presidents couldn’t be criminally prosecuted as long as the crimes they committed fell under the umbrella of official acts. Even Bill Barr would have never dreamed of arguing the president could use SEAL Team Six to assassinate a political rival and walk away with no consequences. Now, the Supreme Court says it’s so.

That’s the context that’s essential for understanding Trump’s Friday evening “nomination” (if you can call a social media announcement that) of Russell Vought to lead the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). Vought is a proponent of a powerful executive and of restructuring our institutions to facilitate a government that veers toward the monarchical and away from the democratic. He was one of only four out of forty-four of Trump’s cabinet officials from his first administration who said they’d support him this time.

Vought entered OMB at the start of Trump’s first administration and was confirmed as its director in July 2020. In the archive of his official biography, his role is described like this: “he is responsible for overseeing the implementation of the President’s policy, management and regulatory agendas across the Executive Branch.” OMB is a powerful agency, and its director is, in a very real sense, a president’s right-hand man. Among the job experience Vought touts in his bio are his seven years as Vice President of Heritage Action for America, a sister organization to the Heritage Foundation, which, as readers of Civil Discourse are well aware, is where Project 2025 was incubated.

The website for the Center for Renewing America lists Vought as its President. Jeff Clark, the DOJ appointee who tried to use the Justice Department to do Trump’s bidding and spread the Big Lie following the 2020 election is a fellow at the Center, as is Ken Cuccinelli, who wrote the DHS chapter of Project 2025. Its mission is “to renew a consensus of America as a nation under God with unique interests worthy of defending that flow from its people, institutions, and history, where individuals’ enjoyment of freedom is predicated on just laws and healthy communities.” The Project 2025 website lists the Center as one of the 100 groups that are part of its advisory board.

Now Vought, godfather to Project 2025 and author of its chapter on OMB, will be in charge of administering policy in the next Trump Administration. So much for Trump’s efforts—back when reporting about Project 2025 led to enormous public concern and seemed poised to shift the tide against him— to distance himself from the project. At the time, he disavowed any knowledge of or agreement with the plan, but the claims felt hollow.

In fact, we discussed Trump’s ties to Project 2025, despite his claim that he knew nothing, back in August. Here’s the linchpin, showing that Trump was being disingenuous in that post:

“Tonight, the Washington Post reported that in April 2022, Trump and Heritage Foundation President Kevin Roberts, the front man for Project 2025, took a 45-minute private plane flight together to get to a Heritage Foundation conference where the former president was one of the speakers. Trump told the audience that the Heritage Foundation was ‘going to lay the groundwork and detail plans for exactly what our movement will do.’

Project 2025 is a wrap. It’s locked, loaded, and ready to go. If you believe it’s about to disappear or that Trump won’t use any of it, I have some swampland in Florida for you.

How do we know that? Because Kevin Roberts told us so. After Trump made his threat, and Paul Dans, who had been running the Project at Heritage, stepped down, Roberts said on Twitter that ‘Project 2025 has completed exactly what it set out to do.’”


Continues…

https://joycevance.substack.com/p/project-2025-its-on-predictably?r=5n3e&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&triedRedirect=true

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

no awards for moral courage for this bunch after ignoring the problem for years msongs 17 hrs ago #1
No, but probably only lame ducks felt free enough to do this DFW 16 hrs ago #3
But removing the cap technically isn't raising taxes, it's just adjusting contributions. nt in2herbs 9 hrs ago #18
To anyone who would have to pay more of their paycheck than they do now DFW 4 hrs ago #30
They're not all lame ducks. ShazzieB 8 hrs ago #26
The obvious simple solution is to raise or, better yet, remove the cap on income levels... GReedDiamond 17 hrs ago #2
I paid double the SS for nearly 40 years being self employed years ago Bengus81 10 hrs ago #10
Exactly, Thune always has a mealy mouthed response/retort... IthinkThereforeIAM 9 hrs ago #19
I completey agree they should remove the cap jgmiller 8 hrs ago #24
I think the obvious solution is to not be simple DFW 15 hrs ago #4
Most of these people are so wealthy they would not miss this money. travelingthrulife 11 hrs ago #6
They might have to pay for a tank of fuel for their 400' yacht Bengus81 10 hrs ago #11
Right, none of them are going to be faced with eviction or have their diet changed... IthinkThereforeIAM 9 hrs ago #20
The other solutions all are politically unpopular. SamuelAdams 11 hrs ago #7
Do what we do for all of the wars -- borrow. Also, Obama managed to extend the date by a year. Nt lostnfound 11 hrs ago #9
Bush like Trump wants SS privatized so some bud of theirs can get hold Bengus81 10 hrs ago #12
Social Security Trustees are all MAGA Kid Berwyn 11 hrs ago #5
And that was intentional... IthinkThereforeIAM 9 hrs ago #21
Project 2025 is MAGA for Urinary Executive (Trickle Down Forever) Kid Berwyn 9 hrs ago #23
What a waste to work for 45 years and to spend money helping those who needed it lostnfound 11 hrs ago #8
(a percent of which comprises the revenue). mdbl 10 hrs ago #15
Maybe the 4 Senators can come up with good ideas Buddyzbuddy 10 hrs ago #13
REMOVE. THE. CAP. TygrBright 10 hrs ago #14
Exactly, let everyone pay the same percentage on their Payroll Tax obligation. It is simply a huge gift to the Exp 8 hrs ago #27
Precisely! CoopersDad 2 hrs ago #33
Experts like Paul Krugman say vary affordable fixes are available to keep SS solvent. Republicans insist on holding SS Martin68 9 hrs ago #16
There is no "solvency" issue. It is bullshit. valleyrogue 9 hrs ago #17
It's like saying the USPS loses money. Bullshit. nt. druidity33 3 hrs ago #31
"3 of the 4 won't be there next year, not just Cassidy and Tillis but Durbin too." Wednesdays 9 hrs ago #22
"And what are they going to do when The Felon vetoes their bill?" BumRushDaShow 8 hrs ago #25
It's not hard ...get rid of the cap or make the donut plan JT45242 8 hrs ago #28
During COVID in 2020, I bought a house. mnhtnbb 7 hrs ago #29
Are you also making 2X monthly payments? CoopersDad 2 hrs ago #34
No, right now short term interest rates mnhtnbb 1 hr ago #36
Eliminating the payroll cap would solve the problem. Any Democrats who suggest anything else are not Democrats. Dangling0826 2 hrs ago #32
Gee whiz Katcat 2 hrs ago #35
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Four senior senators expr...»Reply #23