Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Nobody needs AI to search the Internet, court says in ruling against Google [View all]SouthBayDem
(33,422 posts)53. It's human nature to expect the biggest reward for the lowest cost.
Like the saying goes, why buy the cow when you can get the milk for free? 25 years ago there was the controversy over illegal free music downloads on Napster. And today we see two lines of thought, one that news websites shouldn't put up paywalls (hello, how will the reporters get paid for their work?), another that AI devalues knowledge work.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
80 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Nobody needs AI to search the Internet, court says in ruling against Google [View all]
highplainsdem
Wednesday
OP
You can find them useful. Doesn't change the fact that AI isn't necessary for the task, which these companies are all
Karasu
Wednesday
#4
Um..yes, they are. "Scrolling down" doesn't change that. Companies forcing the use of AI goes MUCH farther than simple
Karasu
Wednesday
#17
Unless you check everything in the AI overview - every alleged fact, every quote, every source - you
highplainsdem
Wednesday
#5
LOL! In other words, you don't check. And it sounds as if you'd use AI overviews you hadn't bothered
highplainsdem
Wednesday
#31
I've seen news stories including studies about the links in AI overviews often not actually leading
highplainsdem
Wednesday
#36
AI search on the internet is a parasite killing its host. There's no value in that. The errors make its
highplainsdem
Wednesday
#51
Of all the silly comparisons. Calculators would never have been widely used if they were as error-prone
highplainsdem
Wednesday
#57
The whopper is everything you've said suggesting people should trust AI results. Even AI companies
highplainsdem
Yesterday
#61
Again, you're trusting AI summaries known to make mistakes. You're also choosing to use AI tools
highplainsdem
20 hrs ago
#69
Unfortunately, I had quite an unpleasant experience to the contrary recently
Betty Boom
19 hrs ago
#75
How can you be sure what the agenda of the AI programmer is? Like an algorithm, it can steer us in the direction
Martin68
19 hrs ago
#78
I, too, usually conduct searches about scientific and other "basic facts," and have found some of the AI summaries
Martin68
15 hrs ago
#80
We were able to do it just fine (in fact, better) BEFORE this immensely destructive shit came along.
Karasu
Wednesday
#3
DuckDuckGo has an AI, but they actually allow you to completely turn it off, and they have a version of their site that
Karasu
Wednesday
#10
Their wanting to put one up around Garden City,Ks and it's projected water use
Bengus81
21 hrs ago
#66
Yes many of these data centers are going up in rural areas, and lack of zoning laws is a big reason
FakeNoose
19 hrs ago
#76
Yes. People need to realize that every single writer, visual artist, photographer, singer, musician,
highplainsdem
Wednesday
#44
So the AI bros ripping off the world's intellectual property is just human nature?
highplainsdem
Yesterday
#59
'Almost Intelligence' trains from anything it can find (within reason, supposedly)
3825-87867
Wednesday
#26
People still use Google? It's a spy agency that sells your data. I stopped ages ago.
usonian
Wednesday
#48
Type -ai at the end of your search and you'll find out how little you need AI
Bengus81
23 hrs ago
#63