Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

SpankMe

(3,762 posts)
16. "News" is a losing proposition at media companies
Tue May 19, 2026, 11:24 AM
Tuesday

They can make money on sports and entertainment (i.e., football and CSI Spokane). But it's hard to eek out profit in the news division.

That's why news sources like PBS and NPR are so good - they don't have a profit motive and can provide solid reporting and analysis.

Most media companies (like the big three) have had internal policies that shield their news divisions from political interference from the C-suite. Unfortunately, they also require their news divisions be profit centers on their own; they won't subsidize the news with cash from more profitable segments of their business. So, the news can be a mix of actual news and fluff or sensationalism to get more viewers and ad revenue. Most network news has remained pretty stable and reliable for the reporting of day-to-day goings on under this model.

Until Trump.

Now, the C-suites are exerting this once banned control in efforts to dodge threats from the administration and curry favor with oligarchs. It's happening with newspapers, too.

While the conservative rich openly contribute to Republican candudates and Trumpers to keep their agenda in force, liberal rich are still feeding and vaccinating children in Africa and promoting green energy. While these are laudible, our republic is in jeopardy. It's time for the rich left to take a different tack until the ship is righted.

It has been suggested that the liberal uber-rich modify their philanthropy a bit and turn their funds toward a new, major news gathering and reporting infrastructure in America, thus relieving the networks of the 'news' burden. This is essentially a super-sized version of the BBC. They could take over full and robust funding of NPR and PBS and turn them into scions of news that effectively analyzes and communicates reality to the people. It would have a stellar reputation as the go-to place for news and opinion.

Yes, feeding and vaccinating the poor and providing clean drinking water is the most honorable use of money. Humanity and all that. But tough times call for tough measures. It's high time for a major pivot of liberal rich from pure humanity to the preservation of Americal democracy.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

They' bring in someone worse, a pig with different lipstick. dem4decades Tuesday #1
No doubt Rebl2 Tuesday #29
Money speaks louder than maga. multigraincracker Tuesday #2
The damage is done. Suck it up. twodogsbarking Tuesday #3
Mission accomplished DBoon Tuesday #22
Good luck bringing viewers back. CBS is essentially dead. n/t Greybnk48 Tuesday #4
Paramount-Skydance You're a day late and a dollar short. Ray Bruns Tuesday #5
Not going to get my news from Trump properties, nope. RedWhiteBlueIsRacist Tuesday #6
Actions have consequences. SergeStorms Tuesday #7
Media circus again truddy777 Tuesday #8
"...the network has seen anemic ratings..." Wednesdays Tuesday #9
I hate her. She's a backstabbing lizard to the LGBTQ community wolfie001 Tuesday #10
She's a professional victim. YodaMom2 Tuesday #18
she doesn't represent women well, either Skittles Tuesday #28
Dave Uglyson and Bibi Weiss tried to turn CBS into a Farce News-Lite - and it all backfired peppertree Tuesday #11
These corporate flunkies are as Interchangeable as Trump's soiled diapers. sop Tuesday #12
FAFO in action again when it comes to licking Trumps cankles...... Bengus81 Tuesday #13
Good.. Cherrycheeks Tuesday #14
I don't really care FakeNoose Tuesday #15
"News" is a losing proposition at media companies SpankMe Tuesday #16
Why not do both? mwmisses4289 Tuesday #23
Just the latest casualty in the attempt to make CBS into Pox News Warpy Tuesday #17
Yep. Rinse and repeat. You'd think they'd learn. Maybe that's asking too much. paleotn Tuesday #21
Money Nasruddin Tuesday #19
Conservative leaning?? That's rich. Fire her ass!!! paleotn Tuesday #20
"... David Ellison, being notoriously Trump-friendly"...??? progressoid Tuesday #24
Billionaires often "give" to whoever is in charge for pay to play BumRushDaShow Tuesday #26
Who is her market? bmichaelh Tuesday #25
He he he - knew it. Knew she wouldn't last. She failed big time and like Trump, instead Marie Marie Tuesday #27
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trump-friendly CBS News h...»Reply #16