Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ShazzieB

(22,536 posts)
19. What does this mean?
Mon Mar 16, 2026, 04:41 PM
Monday

From the article:

"...preliminary reports suggest the U.S. may have accidentally targeted the elementary school, which killed more than 170 students and is the largest U.S.-led killing of civilians in decades."

Does anyone else find the underlined wording to be confusing? To me "targeted" implies a deliberate act, not an accident. I know I can be too literal minded sometimes, but this is tripping me up. How can something be both targeted and an accident? If the school was targeted in error due to carelessness and sloppiness, wouldn't itbmake more sense to say it was "targeted by mistake"?

Sorty if I sound overly pedantic, but to me it makes a difference. This was a heinous act any way you slice it, but imo, knowingly choosing to hit an elementary school is even more heinous than carelessly getting it mixed up with another more "appropriate" location they meant to target. Considering how many other civilian "targets" have been hit (and how how deeply evil both Trump and Hegseth are), I wouldn't put it past them to do something like this on purpose. If so, they should not be allowed ro hide behind the claim that was just an "accident," imo.

I realize that we may not know which it was for a while yet, but I think using unclear wording like "accidentally targeted" muddies the waters.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Kegs Breath had a reason for gutting those positions. groundloop Sunday #1
Are you sure? ARE YOU SURE??? underpants Sunday #2
Propagandists assertions that there is some doubt that the U.S. is responsible for this war crime are ridiculous indeed. pat_k Sunday #5
Killing civilians is part of Hegseth's manly fun. Irish_Dem Sunday #3
Beyond horrific. But you are probably right. pat_k Sunday #6
They are sadistic psychopaths. Irish_Dem Sunday #7
I hope trump and hegsbreath understand what "no quarter" means when they are hauled in. erronis Sunday #4
Traitor. chowder66 Sunday #8
Truth and Reconciliation yankee87 Sunday #9
War crimes? No pass on this crap vapor2 Sunday #10
These fuckers are sadistic and cruel. Initech Monday #11
Does he think he is in a game world? jfz9580m Monday #12
I keep waiting for self-preservation to kick in among the trumpublicans... pat_k Monday #15
What does kayfabe mean outside of wrestling? ShazzieB Monday #18
All politics being theatre jfz9580m Monday #21
Oh, okay! ShazzieB Monday #23
Or it's deliberate and they use AI as the excuse IronLionZion Monday #13
I seriously think jfz9580m Monday #22
Hegseth ignored military officials when (fill in the blank). Vinca Monday #14
The school building WAS part of the adjacent military base. maxsolomon Monday #16
Of course they should have known. pat_k Monday #17
What does this mean? ShazzieB Monday #19
Clearly, they intentionally targeted the building. pat_k Monday #20
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Hegseth ignored military ...»Reply #19