Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Attilatheblond

(6,114 posts)
30. Ah, yes, tranny of the majority. Nope that isn't a good way to govern.
Sat Jun 7, 2025, 04:02 PM
3 hrs ago

Good way to assure ALWAYS losing rural states though

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I'm starting to think secession shouldn't be off table. Of course, would have to move from my rube red state. Silent Type 19 hrs ago #1
Trump is trying to start a civil war it looks like. Irish_Dem 4 hrs ago #26
Aren't those taxes paid by individual taxpayers to the US Treasury? MichMan 19 hrs ago #2
Not all - there are federal excise taxes on alcoholic beverages for example DBoon 19 hrs ago #3
and paying into the CA system (however that works?) stopdiggin 16 hrs ago #8
There could be an escrow account for us Tumbulu 17 hrs ago #4
which would disallow the federal gov from presenting me with the bill? stopdiggin 17 hrs ago #7
In time, yes Tumbulu 11 hrs ago #14
agree with about 90% stopdiggin 8 hrs ago #17
About damned time! flying-skeleton 17 hrs ago #5
"Maybe it's time to cut that off" could be a campaign slogan. PermatexNo.2 17 hrs ago #6
Welcome to DU LetMyPeopleVote 5 hrs ago #22
great talking point! but as a practical matter ... stopdiggin 16 hrs ago #9
California can make a case for "No taxation without Representation" thought crime 12 hrs ago #10
That would mean that a Wyoming taxpayer would pay $66 dollars in income taxes for every $1 a California resident pays MichMan 11 hrs ago #12
No, that would be Absurd. And Wyoming having the same level of representation as CA is just as Absurd. thought crime 9 hrs ago #16
the point (fairly obviously) - is that 'no taxation without representation' stopdiggin 8 hrs ago #18
Have you ever heard the slogan "no taxation without representation"? thought crime 7 hrs ago #20
and my post pointed to the fact that your quote stopdiggin 6 hrs ago #21
Happens all the time with city income taxes MichMan 4 hrs ago #25
CA has a LOT more Reps in the House. The founders worked out a reasonable balance Attilatheblond 3 hrs ago #28
It should have more Senators too, and some of the founders knew it. thought crime 3 hrs ago #29
Ah, yes, tranny of the majority. Nope that isn't a good way to govern. Attilatheblond 3 hrs ago #30
But they are represented. Igel 5 hrs ago #24
Newsom's argument also falls flat if you take it down to a local level MichMan 4 hrs ago #27
What would Gov Newsom's response be if for example Beverly Hills and Bel Air decided to withhold all their state taxes? MichMan 12 hrs ago #11
""Maybe it's time to cut that off," he added." Maybe just "redirect" the tax money to areas tfg cut? nt mitch96 11 hrs ago #13
Sounds like a plan! Fla Dem 9 hrs ago #15
Yup, just maybe time, Newsom. republianmushroom 7 hrs ago #19
I did not think he was speaking about income tax. quaint 5 hrs ago #23
Seems like Rebl2 2 hrs ago #31
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Newsom floats withholding...»Reply #30