Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MichMan

(15,228 posts)
11. What would Gov Newsom's response be if for example Beverly Hills and Bel Air decided to withhold all their state taxes?
Sat Jun 7, 2025, 07:09 AM
12 hrs ago

and keep them for themselves because they pay out more than they receive from the state?

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I'm starting to think secession shouldn't be off table. Of course, would have to move from my rube red state. Silent Type 19 hrs ago #1
Trump is trying to start a civil war it looks like. Irish_Dem 4 hrs ago #26
Aren't those taxes paid by individual taxpayers to the US Treasury? MichMan 19 hrs ago #2
Not all - there are federal excise taxes on alcoholic beverages for example DBoon 19 hrs ago #3
and paying into the CA system (however that works?) stopdiggin 17 hrs ago #8
There could be an escrow account for us Tumbulu 17 hrs ago #4
which would disallow the federal gov from presenting me with the bill? stopdiggin 17 hrs ago #7
In time, yes Tumbulu 11 hrs ago #14
agree with about 90% stopdiggin 8 hrs ago #17
About damned time! flying-skeleton 17 hrs ago #5
"Maybe it's time to cut that off" could be a campaign slogan. PermatexNo.2 17 hrs ago #6
Welcome to DU LetMyPeopleVote 5 hrs ago #22
great talking point! but as a practical matter ... stopdiggin 17 hrs ago #9
California can make a case for "No taxation without Representation" thought crime 12 hrs ago #10
That would mean that a Wyoming taxpayer would pay $66 dollars in income taxes for every $1 a California resident pays MichMan 11 hrs ago #12
No, that would be Absurd. And Wyoming having the same level of representation as CA is just as Absurd. thought crime 9 hrs ago #16
the point (fairly obviously) - is that 'no taxation without representation' stopdiggin 8 hrs ago #18
Have you ever heard the slogan "no taxation without representation"? thought crime 7 hrs ago #20
and my post pointed to the fact that your quote stopdiggin 6 hrs ago #21
Happens all the time with city income taxes MichMan 4 hrs ago #25
CA has a LOT more Reps in the House. The founders worked out a reasonable balance Attilatheblond 3 hrs ago #28
It should have more Senators too, and some of the founders knew it. thought crime 3 hrs ago #29
Ah, yes, tranny of the majority. Nope that isn't a good way to govern. Attilatheblond 3 hrs ago #30
But they are represented. Igel 5 hrs ago #24
Newsom's argument also falls flat if you take it down to a local level MichMan 4 hrs ago #27
What would Gov Newsom's response be if for example Beverly Hills and Bel Air decided to withhold all their state taxes? MichMan 12 hrs ago #11
""Maybe it's time to cut that off," he added." Maybe just "redirect" the tax money to areas tfg cut? nt mitch96 11 hrs ago #13
Sounds like a plan! Fla Dem 9 hrs ago #15
Yup, just maybe time, Newsom. republianmushroom 7 hrs ago #19
I did not think he was speaking about income tax. quaint 5 hrs ago #23
Seems like Rebl2 2 hrs ago #31
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Newsom floats withholding...»Reply #11