Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

wolfie001

(5,198 posts)

35. If the shoe was on a minority's foot, would the SC even take the case?

Reply to tritsofme (Reply #24)

Fri Jun 6, 2025, 11:35 AM

Yesterday

My 65 years of being a Democrat and watching the destruction of all things sane by the repuke party says "F6ck no."

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

35 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Supreme Court sides with woman claiming anti-straight job discrimination [View all] BumRushDaShow Thursday OP

Because of course they did. Scrivener7 Thursday #1

The decision was unanimous. Ocelot II Thursday #2

I just updated the OP with the latest - this is what Justice Jackson wrote BumRushDaShow Thursday #3

The decision just sends it back for adjudication mdbl Thursday #4

Right. The headline is very misleading. yardwork Thursday #14

This message was self-deleted by its author yardwork Thursday #15

Please angrychair Thursday #19

We'll see how it plays out in the courts mdbl Thursday #21

This ruling angrychair Thursday #23

Fragile White Syndrome is a new condition wolfie001 Thursday #5

Justice Jackson wrote the unanimous opinion for the Court. Does she suffer from this affliction as well? tritsofme Thursday #9

Oh great. Now I have to do some reading wolfie001 Yesterday #32

Fragile White Syndrome has been around since anti discrimination laws first began yellowdogintexas Thursday #13

I'm tired of being picked on because I'm white. Hotler Yesterday #29

Hey! I'm white as well wolfie001 Yesterday #31

I'm right there with you. Another favorite is, "I'm tired of being picked on because of my liberal views.". Hotler Yesterday #33

You too! wolfie001 Yesterday #34

it was a 9-0 decision. all it means is she CAN sue moonshinegnomie Thursday #6

I think DEI is officially DOA. Mosby Thursday #7

This is the correct decision. WhiskeyGrinder Thursday #8

Especially angrychair Thursday #20

So...uh...why do you suppose Justice Jackson, who wrote the opinion, joined by Kagan and Sotomayor tritsofme Yesterday #24

If the shoe was on a minority's foot, would the SC even take the case? wolfie001 Yesterday #35

Apparently you dont understand the decision. Callie1979 Yesterday #26

Obviously. Dr. Strange Thursday #22

So far, all three SC rulings that I'm seeing today have been unanimous Polybius Thursday #10

So you can't take sides against gays either. Am I interpreting correctly? twodogsbarking Thursday #11

No. I'll let DU law experts explain, but the headline is misleading. yardwork Thursday #16

Ah, the details. The devil isn't even hiding. twodogsbarking Thursday #17

To clarify, I don't really think that gays are "anti-straight". They just aren't straight. twodogsbarking Thursday #12

Even the courts are fucked angrychair Thursday #18

They still have to win the suit Shrek Yesterday #25

This ruling angrychair Yesterday #28

"literally" everything? Numerous lawsuits in the past prove otherwise. Callie1979 Yesterday #27

It's like we haven't lived through the last 250 years angrychair Yesterday #30