Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Callie1979

(751 posts)

27. "literally" everything? Numerous lawsuits in the past prove otherwise.

Reply to angrychair (Reply #18)

Fri Jun 6, 2025, 07:24 AM

Yesterday

Whenever ANY group is given total control, there is always a great chance of abuse of that control. And over the years there have been several where white plaintiffs successfully proved that yes, THEY were discriminated against or harassed by others.
Does that mean its the norm? No of course not. But when it happens it SHOULD be called out & stopped.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Shrek

35 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Supreme Court sides with woman claiming anti-straight job discrimination [View all] BumRushDaShow Thursday OP

Because of course they did. Scrivener7 Thursday #1

The decision was unanimous. Ocelot II Thursday #2

I just updated the OP with the latest - this is what Justice Jackson wrote BumRushDaShow Thursday #3

The decision just sends it back for adjudication mdbl Thursday #4

Right. The headline is very misleading. yardwork Thursday #14

This message was self-deleted by its author yardwork Thursday #15

Please angrychair Thursday #19

We'll see how it plays out in the courts mdbl Thursday #21

This ruling angrychair Thursday #23

Fragile White Syndrome is a new condition wolfie001 Thursday #5

Justice Jackson wrote the unanimous opinion for the Court. Does she suffer from this affliction as well? tritsofme Thursday #9

Oh great. Now I have to do some reading wolfie001 Yesterday #32

Fragile White Syndrome has been around since anti discrimination laws first began yellowdogintexas Thursday #13

I'm tired of being picked on because I'm white. Hotler Yesterday #29

Hey! I'm white as well wolfie001 Yesterday #31

I'm right there with you. Another favorite is, "I'm tired of being picked on because of my liberal views.". Hotler Yesterday #33

You too! wolfie001 Yesterday #34

it was a 9-0 decision. all it means is she CAN sue moonshinegnomie Thursday #6

I think DEI is officially DOA. Mosby Thursday #7

This is the correct decision. WhiskeyGrinder Thursday #8

Especially angrychair Thursday #20

So...uh...why do you suppose Justice Jackson, who wrote the opinion, joined by Kagan and Sotomayor tritsofme Yesterday #24

If the shoe was on a minority's foot, would the SC even take the case? wolfie001 Yesterday #35

Apparently you dont understand the decision. Callie1979 Yesterday #26

Obviously. Dr. Strange Thursday #22

So far, all three SC rulings that I'm seeing today have been unanimous Polybius Thursday #10

So you can't take sides against gays either. Am I interpreting correctly? twodogsbarking Thursday #11

No. I'll let DU law experts explain, but the headline is misleading. yardwork Thursday #16

Ah, the details. The devil isn't even hiding. twodogsbarking Thursday #17

To clarify, I don't really think that gays are "anti-straight". They just aren't straight. twodogsbarking Thursday #12

Even the courts are fucked angrychair Thursday #18

They still have to win the suit Shrek Yesterday #25

This ruling angrychair Yesterday #28

"literally" everything? Numerous lawsuits in the past prove otherwise. Callie1979 Yesterday #27

It's like we haven't lived through the last 250 years angrychair Yesterday #30