Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Bengus81

(8,876 posts)

5. Musk and Melanie BOTH got to remain in the US while their immigration cases "played out".

Reply to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Fri May 30, 2025, 11:49 AM

May 30

But NOW it looks like another round of..."I voted for Trump because he said in his campaign my cousin could stay in the US under protection since he's not a criminal".

Yeah well...FAFO.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Rebl2 NotHardly Dixc

14 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Supreme Court allows Trump to revoke legal status for 500K migrants for now [View all] BumRushDaShow May 30 OP

This is bullshit. milestogo May 30 #1

Washington Post is shit wolfie001 May 30 #2

Keep the immigrants... sheshe2 May 30 #3

There used to be a difference between "migrants" and "refugees" FakeNoose May 30 #4

Musk and Melanie BOTH got to remain in the US while their immigration cases "played out". Bengus81 May 30 #5

Let me get this straight... GiqueCee May 30 #6

Yes, plus the fact that migrants are a temporary work force, mostly agricultural FakeNoose May 30 #7

7-2 decision? Polybius May 30 #8

According to Newsweek atreides1 May 30 #10

Or the conservative majority joined her. So the majority decision was 7-2, not 6-3? 24601 May 30 #11

I checked, it was 7-2 Polybius May 31 #13

I think this is the tricky thing with executive orders fujiyamasan May 31 #14

At 3,000 per day atreides1 May 30 #9

Revoked (temporary) legal status? WestMichRad May 30 #12