Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LetMyPeopleVote

(169,320 posts)
15. trump's attorneys had to make the legal commitment to refund all tariffs in order to get a stay of the rulings on trump'
Fri May 30, 2025, 10:34 AM
May 2025

These tariffs are subject to judicial review and trump had to make commitments to get a stay.

trump's attorneys had to make the legal commitment to refund all tariffs in order to get a stay of the rulings on trump's tariffs. The court of appeals issued the stay of the two injunctions based on the agreement by the trump administration to refund all tariffs if the ruling of these two courts are upheld on appeal. 






BREAKING - Trump admin pledges to refund tariffs: Donald Trump’s Justice Department persuaded the U.S. Court of Appeals to stay the lower court’s injunction on his emergency tariffs—after pledging to refund anyone who paid them if it ultimately loses. In its filings, the government stated, “If tariffs imposed on plaintiffs during these appeals are ultimately held unlawful, then the government will issue refunds to plaintiffs, including any post-judgment interest that accrues.” The court granted the stay.


Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

7-2 Fail in the Supreme Court Chasstev365 May 2025 #1
seeking immunity at SCOTUS again. They created an addiction for power. /tn bucolic_frolic May 2025 #2
The stupidity of Trump never fails Progressive dog May 2025 #3
He's having a really miserable month. Torchlight May 2025 #4
"delicate diplomatic efforts" ?? yonder May 2025 #5
Checks and balances, Mr President k_buddy762 May 2025 #6
But A-okay for non-elected DOGE to decide the fate of thousands and US policies? sinkingfeeling May 2025 #7
El Stupido and his band of traitors should understand - Nigrum Cattus May 2025 #8
All those high-priced lawyers working for Chump FakeNoose May 2025 #9
"A stay is critical to avoid immediate irreparable harm to United States foreign policy and national security." Grins May 2025 #10
Filed with the court - yesterday. Same DAY as the decision. Grins May 2025 #11
That's only if Congress enacts them. Not the President. cstanleytech May 2025 #12
Exactly when was SCROTUS elected? dickthegrouch May 2025 #13
Do They Mean "Unelected Judges" Like the Supremes Who Lied in Their Hearings, Have Foresworn Precedent, The Roux Comes First May 2025 #14
trump's attorneys had to make the legal commitment to refund all tariffs in order to get a stay of the rulings on trump' LetMyPeopleVote May 2025 #15
We shall see if the roberts court believes in the rules of law. republianmushroom May 2025 #16
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»'Not for unelected judges...»Reply #15