Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

sinkingfeeling

(55,403 posts)

7. But A-okay for non-elected DOGE to decide the fate of thousands and US policies?

Reply to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Thu May 29, 2025, 01:36 PM

May 29

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

6 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Marthe48 FakeNoose Dem2theMax MustBeTheBooz thought crime joshdawg

16 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

'Not for unelected judges to decide': Trump admin says tariffs are 'immune from judicial scrutiny' as it appeals order [View all] BumRushDaShow May 29 OP

7-2 Fail in the Supreme Court Chasstev365 May 29 #1

seeking immunity at SCOTUS again. They created an addiction for power. /tn bucolic_frolic May 29 #2

The stupidity of Trump never fails Progressive dog May 29 #3

He's having a really miserable month. Torchlight May 29 #4

"delicate diplomatic efforts" ?? yonder May 29 #5

Checks and balances, Mr President k_buddy762 May 29 #6

But A-okay for non-elected DOGE to decide the fate of thousands and US policies? sinkingfeeling May 29 #7

El Stupido and his band of traitors should understand - Nigrum Cattus May 29 #8

All those high-priced lawyers working for Chump FakeNoose May 29 #9

"A stay is critical to avoid immediate irreparable harm to United States foreign policy and national security." Grins May 29 #10

Filed with the court - yesterday. Same DAY as the decision. Grins May 29 #11

That's only if Congress enacts them. Not the President. cstanleytech May 29 #12

Exactly when was SCROTUS elected? dickthegrouch May 29 #13

Do They Mean "Unelected Judges" Like the Supremes Who Lied in Their Hearings, Have Foresworn Precedent, The Roux Comes First May 29 #14

trump's attorneys had to make the legal commitment to refund all tariffs in order to get a stay of the rulings on trump' LetMyPeopleVote May 30 #15

We shall see if the roberts court believes in the rules of law. republianmushroom May 30 #16

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»'Not for unelected judges...»Reply #7