Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Paladin

(31,528 posts)
3. The judges' apprehensions are obviously well-founded.
Mon May 26, 2025, 05:50 AM
May 2025

Without question, trump would minimize protection for any judges who displeased him with their findings. And the further away their personal security is from the odious Pam Bondi's control, the better. Yet another shameful development from this scofflaw regime.

Recommendations

9 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

How though? SSJVegeta May 2025 #1
I'm sure the dog killer will be all over that... Javaman May 2025 #18
"Competing factions markodochartaigh May 2025 #2
The judges' apprehensions are obviously well-founded. Paladin May 2025 #3
US Marshals showed themselves from day one as Trump's Nazi Gestapo. Irish_Dem May 2025 #4
This is what judges get for coddling Trump perdita9 May 2025 #5
THIS NotHardly May 2025 #10
Apparently in the markodochartaigh May 2025 #12
Anonymity on phone calls ought to be made illegal Fullduplexxx May 2025 #6
Where do I sign up. twodogsbarking May 2025 #7
Maybe they need their own Revenue Service too ToxMarz May 2025 #8
They can fill the ranks with all the MAGA folk they refused to properly punish. travelingthrulife May 2025 #9
Hmm... Quis custodiet... GJGCA May 2025 #11
A good read. Thank you. ancianita May 2025 #15
They better do it while they still can. mdbl May 2025 #13
Democrats should consider doing that hadEnuf May 2025 #14
Congress would have to approve madville May 2025 #16
Do it. joanbarnes May 2025 #17
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»US federal judges conside...»Reply #3