Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Karma13612

(4,750 posts)

6. I'm not sure of your math..

Reply to in2herbs (Reply #3)

Fri Apr 4, 2025, 05:31 PM

Friday

I thought that after all the ballots were counted, the Democratic candidate was up by 734 votes. In essence, she was the winner.
The trailing sore loser Republican Candidate decided to question some 60,000 votes for various reasons. If he prevails, then there are potentially 60,000 votes that are not counted. So, he wins.

As I said, that’s just my understanding of this vote suppressing debacle.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

North Carolina judges side with Republican colleague in close Supreme Court race [View all] Eugene Friday OP

15 days dweller Friday #1

Is it 15 business days? subterranean Friday #4

Evil criminal rePUKE syndicate wolfie001 Friday #2

The winner's margin was 734 votes out of the 60,000+ claimed to be fraudulent. So if 734 votes in2herbs Friday #3

I'm not sure of your math.. Karma13612 Friday #6

That clairifies the data. TY in2herbs Friday #7

Those fckrs......eom Karma13612 Friday #5