Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LetMyPeopleVote

(161,377 posts)
2. Judge 'looks very likely' to hold Trump officials in contempt: legal expert
Thu Apr 3, 2025, 04:15 PM
Apr 3

trump and company ignored a clear ruling by this court and acted in bad faith. Contempt is appropriate
https://bsky.app/profile/realtuckfrumper.bsky.social/post/3llwp7dzy5l2j



https://www.rawstory.com/judge-boasberg-contempt-2671671151/

U.S. District Judge James E. Boasberg on Thursday asked some eyebrow-raising questions that made at least one expert believe that he's likely to hold some Trump administration officials in contempt.

As reported by legal journalist Adam Klasfeld, Boasberg on Thursday asked "a series of questions about whom he should find in contempt if he finds probably cause for such an action."

Shortly after this, according to Klasfeld, Boasberg asked, "If I find probable cause for contempt, would the government want an opportunity to purge the contempt?"

Boasberg has been overseeing a lawsuit filed on behalf of Venezuelan immigrants who were detained and flown to a prison in El Salvador even after he had issued an order for them not to be deported from the country. He has often expressed frustration with administration officials' answers to his questions about the case.

According to New York University Law School professor Ryan Goodman, Boasberg's questioning on Thursday makes it look like he's ready to take the next step.
"Chief Judge Boasberg looks very likely to hold U.S. officials in contempt and is now drilling down on: WHO exactly made the decision not to turn the planes around or otherwise return the detainees? Would government bring back the detainees to undo contempt?" he observed on BlueSky.



Recommendations

6 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The fuck is there to "consider?" They are blatantly saying the courts don't matter and they can ignore anything judges SSJVegeta Apr 3 #1
Boasberg Shares Your Rage -- Valor Is The Better Part Of Honor -- Discretion Is The Better Part Of Valor MayReasonRule Apr 3 #4
Well said, thank you!! SSJVegeta Apr 3 #5
Right On Y'all!!! Each Of Us Here Shares Your Rage. I Guarantee It. MayReasonRule Apr 3 #6
Judge 'looks very likely' to hold Trump officials in contempt: legal expert LetMyPeopleVote Apr 3 #2
This could get interesting hueymahl Apr 3 #3
LOL. Add the term "contemplating" to the long list of meaningless judicial utterances. PSPS Apr 3 #7
Hmm... You Think So Huh... Honestly, My Personal Assessment Is He's Not Fuckin' Around... MayReasonRule Apr 3 #8
Might get to the question, Can a president pardon bluestarone Apr 3 #9
I'd expect him to try to. calimary Apr 3 #15
And Trump Administration officials are now at risk of being found in Contempt of Court. LetMyPeopleVote Apr 3 #10
LOCK usonian Apr 3 #11
THEM usonian Apr 3 #12
UP usonian Apr 3 #13
Do it, Judge Boasberg! calimary Apr 3 #14
JUST FUCKING DO IT!!! 2naSalit Apr 4 #16
Stop contemplating and uphold the law goddamit! Martin68 Apr 4 #17
"contemplating", republianmushroom Apr 4 #18
Excuse me, but fuck him. Grins Apr 4 #19
Hasn't happened yet orangecrush Apr 4 #20
Didn't your high school English teacher tell you NJCher Saturday #23
I Agree... MayReasonRule Monday #27
No. I stand by my statement. Grins Monday #28
LOL NJCher Monday #29
Yeah, whatever. Wake me when he actually *does* something. n/t malthaussen Apr 4 #21
Then they'll try to impeach him. louis-t Apr 4 #22
Stop comptemplating! DO IT!!! Fla Dem Saturday #24
Believe we are about to see how many are above the law. republianmushroom Saturday #25
What exactly would that do quakerboy Monday #26
Garland contemplated for 23 months. nt Hotler Tuesday #30
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Judge Boasberg says he's ...»Reply #2