Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

JohnSJ

(98,883 posts)
11. No I am not. The question is are doing this on the basis of the activities of taking over a campus building, vandalism,
Mon Mar 10, 2025, 07:15 PM
Mar 2025

and activities on private property where Columbia is situated on, or some other charge?

Are they providing him with due process, etc.

As a legal resident with a green card he can be deported if they have evidence of certain criteria that allows it:

https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/grounds-deportability-when-legal-us-residents-can-be-removed.html#:~:text=Even%20someone%20with%20a%20green,the%20United%20States%20and%20removed.&text=U.S.%20law%20contains%20a%20long,to%20their%20country%20of%20origin.

The courts will decide this based on if there is any evidence of violations. If not, then they have no grounds, he won't be subject to deportation, and probably will have case for a lawsuit.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

K&R nt berniesandersmittens Mar 2025 #1
Trump personally demanded that he be deported. Klarkashton Mar 2025 #2
Less "didn't know" -- more "didn't care"... regnaD kciN Mar 2025 #3
Or apparently Israel doesn't like Bok_Tukalo Mar 2025 #4
What exactly are you saying? JohnSJ Mar 2025 #6
It depends. If a person commits certain violations regardless if they have green card and permanent residency, they can JohnSJ Mar 2025 #5
The green card or permanent residency doesn't matter, he can still be deported if he has committed certain violations. JohnSJ Mar 2025 #7
Like free speech? iemanja Mar 2025 #10
No I am not. The question is are doing this on the basis of the activities of taking over a campus building, vandalism, JohnSJ Mar 2025 #11
That is not the basis for deportation iemanja Mar 2025 #13
That is not correct. If someone within 5 years of becoming a permanent resident commited certain crimes, including an JohnSJ Mar 2025 #19
He has been charged with no crime iemanja Mar 2025 #20
I have no idea what their grounds are for his deportation. I was specifically addressing your comment that implied JohnSJ Mar 2025 #21
Read your own source iemanja Mar 2025 #23
Murder is an aggravated felony iemanj, and subject to deportation for a Permanent Resident. That isn't case here though JohnSJ Mar 2025 #24
It's according to the law iemanja Mar 2025 #25
No, it doesn't even have to be a crime per se There are a lot of small details such as not notifying of a change of JohnSJ Mar 2025 #27
We're talking about Trump iemanja Mar 2025 #30
You may be talking about trump, I am not. A judge has blocked any deportation to view if there is any JohnSJ Mar 2025 #31
In addition, your own source sites the specific iemanja Mar 2025 #22
What is considered an aggravated felony? That may not even be what they are using for grounds of deportation JohnSJ Mar 2025 #26
An aggravated felony requires at least iemanja Mar 2025 #28
ok JohnSJ Mar 2025 #29
I don't know how they'll make the case, but I'm guessing they'll use the provision about providing aid to a LauraInLA Mar 2025 #15
You guessed wrong iemanja Mar 2025 #17
Thanks for the update -- yes, I know he hasn't. The idiots thought he was on a student visa, so they wouldn't have to go LauraInLA Mar 2025 #32
He hasn't been charged with a crime iemanja Mar 2025 #18
Once upon a time Nixon almost caused a mistrial by saying he thought Manson was guilty Prairie Gates Mar 2025 #8
Simpler times. Klarkashton Mar 2025 #9
It depends, and it will be up to the courts, but this could be more than an issue of free speech. As for the Nixon JohnSJ Mar 2025 #12
Having read the legal grounds for revocation of a green card, I'm guessing they'll have to argue he was providing aid to LauraInLA Mar 2025 #14
I think they made a big mistake here -- they thought this would be a signature slam dunk for their new policy. LauraInLA Mar 2025 #16
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Judge temporarily blocks ...»Reply #11