General Discussion

Polybius

(22,413 posts)

63. Rubio's was 2016, and went a lot further than Harris in the primaries

Reply to DFW (Reply #61)

Wed Jul 15, 2026, 05:17 AM

22 hrs ago

He's also grown considerably since then. He'd be far less easy to beat than Vance.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

98 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Harris ahead of Newsom by double digits in poll [View all] Melon Friday OP

And ahead of every other potential Democratic candidate by even more. W_HAMILTON Friday #1

A Harris, AOC or Harris, Newsom ticket would beat anything in 2028 thought crime Tuesday #47

The definition of insanity Terry_M Friday #2

maybe they see how stupid that was? mopinko Friday #4

Nope Boo1 Friday #7

Kamala Harris won gab13by13 Tuesday #52

That and ten bucks will get you.......🤷‍♀️ ColoringFool 19 hrs ago #69

No Terry_M Friday #22

In the 198 year history of our Party only one Democrat every won the POTUS after losing a POTUS Celerity Friday #25

i thought bryant had run as a populist before that but i guess not rampartd 18 hrs ago #84

Wishful thinking. mdbl Tuesday #45

Is this a serious response? Ziggy Beans 18 hrs ago #80

Yes, we need to mobilize them. CrimsonBight 17 hrs ago #86

You're not interested in a replay of the "he's for you..." ad for months on end, except with Vance, DJTJR or Rubio? BannonsLiver Friday #18

Like Richard Nixon? anamnua Friday #26

She is trying to change that mindset angrychair Friday #30

No it wont... berksdem Tuesday #51

Kamala will be a much stronger candidate thought crime 20 hrs ago #66

I really like Kamala but I don't believe any woman can be elected president at this time. Demsrule86 11 hrs ago #94

I really hope this is sarcasm Ziggy Beans 18 hrs ago #81

Rude responses Cirsium 18 hrs ago #85

In my humble opinion angrychair 14 hrs ago #89

You're free to believe that Ziggy Beans 12 hrs ago #90

That was a sincere question angrychair 11 hrs ago #93

Oh, sounds like another one of those, IF she's it i'm not voting Democrat. bluestarone 12 hrs ago #91

Well, you're completely wrong Ziggy Beans 12 hrs ago #92

I won't support her in the primary iemanja Tuesday #40

I agree. Demsrule86 11 hrs ago #95

I like her a good bit and have no doubt Cosmocat 18 hrs ago #83

They wouldn't pinkstarburst 15 hrs ago #87

These numbers will be quite different after the first primary debate. Intractable Friday #3

I knew she was in the mix, but Ars Longa Friday #5

polling at this point pretty much is. mopinko Friday #10

Every possible candidate angrychair Friday #31

In 2007, Hillary Clinton was the front runner SocialDemocrat61 Friday #6

she didnt win, but she came pretty close. mopinko Friday #11

Close only counts with SocialDemocrat61 Friday #12

i'm just sayin- it wasnt measuring nothing. mopinko Friday #13

FYI 2007 polls also had SocialDemocrat61 Friday #14

I'm not sure you know what "meaningless" means? Ilikepurple Friday #20

None SocialDemocrat61 Friday #21

This I agree with. I would say not very reliable but also not meaningless. Ilikepurple Friday #23

As the saying goes SocialDemocrat61 Friday #24

She lost the rustbelt... Demsrule86 11 hrs ago #96

I wish she had won Polybius Tuesday #42

Only once in the last 75 years has the same party won three in a row. MichMan 18 hrs ago #77

I never said that she would win in 2012 Polybius 7 hrs ago #97

Quantus Insights doesn't seem to have a lot of presence, though they do call themselves "a premier polling Scrivener7 Friday #8

What exactly was the question? "Who do you recognize in this list?" "Who would you vote for?" QueerDuck Friday #9

Yeah let me clarify something because the poll is very confusing... Takket Friday #15

In 2002, Joe Lieberman was leading polls like this. It's purely a name recognition contest at this point. tritsofme Friday #16

Lol BannonsLiver Friday #17

Way, way too early to be polling the 2028 primary races. MineralMan Friday #19

These must be consulting firms fujiyamasan Tuesday #46

Only those who have risen to the challenge of taking on this fascist administration are qualified, IMO. Doodley Friday #27

Neither will win vs a Republican DenaliDemocrat Friday #28

"Broader appeal" angrychair Friday #32

Yeah - she's not winning the swing states DenaliDemocrat Saturday #38

That means nothing Polybius Tuesday #44

It would be the other way around with today's GOP primary electorate. BannonsLiver Tuesday #49

I can't think of a better candidate to bring together the whole coalition thought crime 21 hrs ago #65

I think that would be a huge gamble pinkstarburst 18 hrs ago #78

Super exciting angrychair Friday #29

She will be a great president ! /nt thought crime 21 hrs ago #64

Post removed Post removed Friday #33

We have midterms to worry about first sarisataka Friday #34

No, thank you. hamsterjill Saturday #35

Harris is not for me in the next election. Melon Saturday #36

Quantus Insights is best known for having the "most accurate" poll in predicting the Trump win in 2024. PufPuf23 Saturday #37

Very good points. 👍 littlemissmartypants Tuesday #39

I'll vote for whoever we nominate, but if it's Harris vs. Rubio, we're in trouble Polybius Tuesday #41

The only one I could picture, (at this point), going up against a Rubio Ars Longa Tuesday #58

I would suspect that the Republicans are smart enough not to nominate Rubio DFW Tuesday #61

Rubio's was 2016, and went a lot further than Harris in the primaries Polybius 22 hrs ago #63

I agree on that point DFW 20 hrs ago #68

Fair enough, I just hope that people take him seriously, and not assume it'll be a cakewalk Polybius 19 hrs ago #73

With Republican money and Russian coaching DFW 18 hrs ago #75

I prefer someone like Senator Murphy. Emile Tuesday #43

He's my choice. A fighter with common sense. Scrivener7 Tuesday #53

Neither will be the nominee Renew Deal Tuesday #48

Rubio vs. who then? Polybius Tuesday #54

I'm just going to hope this is all about name recognition at this point fujiyamasan Tuesday #50

This would be a huge mistake pinkstarburst Tuesday #55

How long before they drag out the old "Killer Kamala" signs MorbidButterflyTat Tuesday #56

Message auto-removed Name removed Tuesday #57

I'd support her if she's the nominee. Waaaay oasis Tuesday #59

My vote and support will be for B.See Tuesday #60

Why is it that when a Dem nominee loses they are expected to not bother running again? BluenFLA Tuesday #62

Gore really WAS robbed. ColoringFool 19 hrs ago #70

What twice in recent history? Polybius 19 hrs ago #74

What twice in recent history? Trump and who else? pinkstarburst 18 hrs ago #82

The poster never responded, but I suspect they meant Nixon and Trump Polybius 7 hrs ago #98

Let's get thru 2026 first struggle4progress 20 hrs ago #67

Most sensible post on this thread. Vinca 19 hrs ago #71

That's why Republicans aren't overly worried. tavernier 19 hrs ago #72

Post removed Post removed 18 hrs ago #76

What happened to the OP? Kingofalldems 18 hrs ago #79

Two things Bettie 15 hrs ago #88