Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Ars Longa

(735 posts)

5. I knew she was in the mix, but

Reply to Melon (Original post)

Fri Jul 10, 2026, 07:22 AM

Yesterday

35%??
Is it name recognition?
I don't dislike her, but I was not considering her...
We need to turn the page-on the Trump Era!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

superpatriotman

38 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Harris ahead of Newsom by double digits in poll [View all] Melon Yesterday OP

And ahead of every other potential Democratic candidate by even more. W_HAMILTON Yesterday #1

The definition of insanity Terry_M Yesterday #2

maybe they see how stupid that was? mopinko Yesterday #4

Nope Boo1 Yesterday #7

No Terry_M Yesterday #22

In the 198 year history of our Party only one Democrat every won the POTUS after losing a POTUS Celerity 22 hrs ago #25

You're not interested in a replay of the "he's for you..." ad for months on end, except with Vance, DJTJR or Rubio? BannonsLiver Yesterday #18

Like Richard Nixon? anamnua 22 hrs ago #26

She is trying to change that mindset angrychair 21 hrs ago #30

These numbers will be quite different after the first primary debate. Intractable Yesterday #3

I knew she was in the mix, but Ars Longa Yesterday #5

polling at this point pretty much is. mopinko Yesterday #10

Every possible candidate angrychair 21 hrs ago #31

In 2007, Hillary Clinton was the front runner SocialDemocrat61 Yesterday #6

she didnt win, but she came pretty close. mopinko Yesterday #11

Close only counts with SocialDemocrat61 Yesterday #12

i'm just sayin- it wasnt measuring nothing. mopinko Yesterday #13

FYI 2007 polls also had SocialDemocrat61 Yesterday #14

I'm not sure you know what "meaningless" means? Ilikepurple Yesterday #20

None SocialDemocrat61 Yesterday #21

This I agree with. I would say not very reliable but also not meaningless. Ilikepurple 23 hrs ago #23

As the saying goes SocialDemocrat61 23 hrs ago #24

Quantus Insights doesn't seem to have a lot of presence, though they do call themselves "a premier polling Scrivener7 Yesterday #8

What exactly was the question? "Who do you recognize in this list?" "Who would you vote for?" QueerDuck Yesterday #9

Yeah let me clarify something because the poll is very confusing... Takket Yesterday #15

In 2002, Joe Lieberman was leading polls like this. It's purely a name recognition contest at this point. tritsofme Yesterday #16

Lol BannonsLiver Yesterday #17

Way, way too early to be polling the 2028 primary races. MineralMan Yesterday #19

Only those who have risen to the challenge of taking on this fascist administration are qualified, IMO. Doodley 22 hrs ago #27

Neither will win vs a Republican DenaliDemocrat 21 hrs ago #28

"Broader appeal" angrychair 21 hrs ago #32

Yeah - she's not winning the swing states DenaliDemocrat 4 hrs ago #38

Super exciting angrychair 21 hrs ago #29

Post removed Post removed 21 hrs ago #33

We have midterms to worry about first sarisataka 21 hrs ago #34

No, thank you. hamsterjill 18 hrs ago #35

Harris is not for me in the next election. Melon 18 hrs ago #36

Quantus Insights is best known for having the "most accurate" poll in predicting the Trump win in 2024. PufPuf23 17 hrs ago #37