Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ancianita

(43,410 posts)
19. Thank you. If Republicans actually read this article before the confirmation hearings, they still might
Thu Jun 11, 2026, 07:01 PM
4 hrs ago

not be swayed to change their votes.

Trump formally nominated Blanche on Monday.
Blanche’s next step is to submit paperwork to the Senate Judiciary Committee, which requires financial disclosures, an FBI background check and a completed questionnaire.

The Senate Judiciary Committee can only schedule Blanche’s confirmation hearing 28 days after he’s turned in all paperwork. And since Blanche could submit those documents soon, given that he went through the confirmation process as deputy AG just last year, the earliest date Committee Chair Chuck Grassley (R-IA) could schedule a hearing is likely mid-July. The fastest timeline from then would involve a committee vote around the end of July, with a floor vote right before the Senate leaves town for August recess.

That's only if things go according to Senate GOP leaders’ plans without further holdups.

Because, since Democrats say they’ll oppose Blanche’s nomination, the Comte only needs one Republican “no” vote to sink it.

12 Republicans on the Committee: Chair Chuck Grassley (R-IA) Lindsey Graham, John Cornyn, Mike Lee, Ted Cruz, Josh Hawley, Thom Tillis, John Kennedy, Marsha Blackburn, Eric Schmitt, Katie Britt, and Ashley Moody.
10 Democrats: Dick Durbin, Sheldon Whitehouse, Amy Klobuchar, Chris Coons, Richard Blumenthal, Mazie Hirono, Cory Booker, Alex Padilla, Peter Welch, and Adam Schiff.


IDK which Republican might make clear they’ll derail Blanche’s confirmation, but if they do, it will get headlines. After that, idk if Grassley (on his way out) might or might not push the process forward.

Then I can only guess we're left with what Trump does with or through the DOJ before the midterms.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Trump cant allow anyone in the Epstein files to be charged because his name would come up in their trial. LetMyPeopleVote Yesterday #1
Duh! malaise Yesterday #2
Psaki as well. sheshe2 Yesterday #4
Getting lots of coverage malaise Yesterday #5
It makes me sick! sheshe2 Yesterday #7
TY, LMPV, for all this valuable information Cha Yesterday #3
Makes one wonder how far back this coverup goes. Recall the first impeachment bucolic_frolic Yesterday #6
Wow you may be right about that FakeNoose Yesterday #8
Indeed it does. calimary Yesterday #9
The ENTIRE WHITE HOUSE IS A CRIME SCENE! sheshe2 23 hrs ago #11
Here is the NYT article, paywall free.... reACTIONary 23 hrs ago #10
Thank you. lamp_shade 19 hrs ago #12
Of Course Blanche is at the center of the cover-up. He's Trump's personal attorney. Bondi was set up to fail ChicagoTeamster 15 hrs ago #13
Blanche committed fraud with the slush fund thing NY is going to disbar him GusBob 14 hrs ago #14
Not anytime soon. Here's why. ancianita 5 hrs ago #18
Times Exclusive- Inside the White House Freakout Over the Epstein Files (New York Times Gift Article) LetMyPeopleVote 14 hrs ago #15
Thank you. If Republicans actually read this article before the confirmation hearings, they still might ancianita 4 hrs ago #19
Question DET 3 hrs ago #20
First question, no. ancianita 3 hrs ago #21
Certainly explains why Trump is so eager to have Blanche lead the Justice Departmenr. Martin68 12 hrs ago #16
So many should be disbarred at the least... him, Cannon... themaguffin 12 hrs ago #17
Oh gosh - Judge Cannon! calimary 54 min ago #22
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»House Dem Says 'Explosive...»Reply #19