General Discussion

Hope22

(4,699 posts)

9. The pregnant woman's profession was assisting women to deliver safely....got it?

Sat Mar 14, 2026, 11:30 AM

Yesterday

She sited the statistics and a man, not involved in healthcare found for the corporation. I hope they never come for your balls because eventually they will. They force women to have babies, force them to have surgery to deliver them and deny them healthcare to pay for it and deny maternity leave to deal with the loss of income. The line was crossed when government got involved in telling women what to do with their bodies!!! But then who will fight the wars………..

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

15 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

leftstreet Joinfortmill oberle WizGlick colorado_ufo love_katz Shipwack CaliforniaPeggy Attilatheblond bluestarone Jilly_in_VA ShazzieB LittleGirl buzzycrumbhunger Crunchy Frog

83 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

They Didn't Want to Have C-Sections. A Judge Would Decide How They Gave Birth. [View all] WhiskeyGrinder Yesterday OP

a 3 hr hearing when she is in ACTIVE LABOR??!!!! mopinko Yesterday #1

Wow. That is appalling. The child is more important than the woman, no matter what. Biophilic Yesterday #2

Extreme situation. But perhaps it was the safest option for woman and child. paleotn Yesterday #4

What's extreme about this situation is forcing someone who's in active labor into a court hearing to establish legally WhiskeyGrinder Yesterday #5

What about dying makes it unacceptable? paleotn Yesterday #6

People make medical decisions that result in their own deaths all the time. WhiskeyGrinder Yesterday #7

And that's perfectly fine with me. paleotn Yesterday #37

You're reccing your own posts? Crunchy Frog 16 hrs ago #67

So what. I didn't rec if 4 TIMES paleotn 10 hrs ago #76

Exhibit A: all those Jehovah's Witnesses who refuse blood transfusions for themselves OR their children. ShazzieB Yesterday #39

The pregnant woman's profession was assisting women to deliver safely....got it? Hope22 Yesterday #9

Exactly what part of viable, at term, and in fetal distress do you not fucking understand? paleotn Yesterday #38

Your last sentence... GenThePerservering Yesterday #42

Tell that to the person who I responded to, not me. paleotn Yesterday #43

The hearing was three hours long. Quiet Em Yesterday #46

She was in labor for 12 freaking hours!!!!!! paleotn Yesterday #47

and? Quiet Em Yesterday #48

And? An obstetrics team is going to go to all that trouble unless it's for a good reason? paleotn 23 hrs ago #57

No, I'm not an OB-GYN and neither are you. Quiet Em 21 hrs ago #59

SO WHAT!? paleotn 10 hrs ago #75

You seem to believe you know a lot Quiet Em 10 hrs ago #77

And you know that how? paleotn 10 hrs ago #78

What crap has your partner seen many, many times? Quiet Em 10 hrs ago #79

Fine. You don't want trained, profession opinion, go treat yourself. paleotn 10 hrs ago #80

Why are you so hostile? Quiet Em 9 hrs ago #81

Ah, you're being omniscient again. paleotn 9 hrs ago #82

My son was born after 30 hrs. of labor. Whats your point? Lochloosa Yesterday #50

Medical professionals didn't go to this extreme unless there was good reason. paleotn 23 hrs ago #56

12 hours of labor is NOT. VERY. LONG. Crunchy Frog 16 hrs ago #68

Post removed Post removed 10 hrs ago #73

The woman stated she had already had a life threatening complication from a C Section. Hope22 21 hrs ago #61

Yes, I'm willing to sacrifice the lives of some full term fetuses to protect women's rights to bodily autonomy. Crunchy Frog 17 hrs ago #66

It was the woman's profession, but in her own case she was not making the safest decision karynnj Yesterday #44

3 prior c-sections Freddie 23 hrs ago #53

Completely agree karynnj 23 hrs ago #54

My first was a C-section buzzycrumbhunger 22 hrs ago #58

If ONLY the decision was based on the health and welfare of the mother... the existing slightlv Yesterday #45

The patient in question is a doula. usedtobedemgurl Yesterday #49

Because she's a doula doesn't mean she is a good doula. ToxMarz 23 hrs ago #51

Sure. Of course a judge knows better. Ok. usedtobedemgurl 19 hrs ago #62

No, I am not saying that ToxMarz 10 hrs ago #74

Ok usedtobedemgurl 9 hrs ago #83

I worked in that field. When you're in the hospital, you don't have a choice. LeftInTX Yesterday #20

It's not as rare as people think, and it doesn't matter if someone thinks it's "safest". Crunchy Frog 17 hrs ago #65

only the fetus stage Kali Yesterday #8

Yup, the kid is on his or her own. Biophilic Yesterday #19

It seems to me... GiqueCee Yesterday #34

... Solly Mack Yesterday #3

Whose body is it? dlk Yesterday #10

In states like Florida, the state has control over a woman's body erronis Yesterday #11

It's not just Florida. In almost 30 states, hospitals can override the advance directives of pregnant people. WhiskeyGrinder Yesterday #14

Darwin's body. paleotn Yesterday #36

Jeezus. If men gave birth, this would not be a thing. Joinfortmill Yesterday #12

Eh, men do give birth and it still is a thing, but likely because of the discrimination trans men face. WhiskeyGrinder Yesterday #13

I've had four c-sections Mossfern Yesterday #15

I'm so glad you and your babies survived these! erronis Yesterday #17

Thank you for this thoughtful post. LisaM Yesterday #21

I think the trauma Mossfern Yesterday #24

I was a nurse in newborn. LeftInTX Yesterday #23

I was surprised to learn episiotomies aren't recommended anymore Sympthsical Yesterday #33

I had three kids: LeftInTX Yesterday #35

Interesting. Thank you for sharing! Sympthsical 23 hrs ago #55

I have also had four c-sections. Bettie 10 hrs ago #72

Beyond appalling. Mother first, unless both can be saved & the mother's wishes unclear (& she is hlthe2b Yesterday #16

I was going to share this. Thank you so much for doing it! ... littlemissmartypants Yesterday #18

Hands off women's wombs. perverts! GreenWave Yesterday #22

Women of reproductive age need to get the hell out of Florida. This is absurd. Quiet Em Yesterday #25

I see no reason for a judge to be called into this. Ilsa Yesterday #26

If it's an emergency C-Sect, fetal distress, certain maternal conditions, unknown fetal conditions etc. LeftInTX Yesterday #28

Oh, I know, I've been there. I was relieved when Ilsa Yesterday #29

This message was self-deleted by its author MorbidButterflyTat Yesterday #31

That sounds terrifying MorbidButterflyTat Yesterday #32

I lived in a county that for a time had the highest Ilsa Yesterday #27

Wondering... MorbidButterflyTat Yesterday #30

I read the ProPublica article cksmithy Yesterday #40

Glad I posted this thread. It's good to get a reminder about just how easily so many people are willing to sign away WhiskeyGrinder Yesterday #41

3 prior c-sections are a HUGE risk. But, AllyCat 23 hrs ago #52

This story really bothered me so I did some more research Quiet Em 21 hrs ago #60

This is like Rosemary's baby! C Moon 17 hrs ago #63

This is absolutely disgusting. Under no circumstances should women ever be robbed of the right to Crunchy Frog 17 hrs ago #64

Interesting to see how much anti-choice sentiment there really is here on DU. Article and the responses Crunchy Frog 16 hrs ago #69

Agree. WhiskeyGrinder 11 hrs ago #71

OMG 😳 this is insane. The hospital was so wrong in this. If it was me I would be so furious what they did TommieMommy 11 hrs ago #70