Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

EarlG

(23,588 posts)
Thu Mar 12, 2026, 09:38 AM 19 hrs ago

A reminder to all DUers reposting content from social media: Check your sources [View all]

Given the situation in the Middle East, it's understandable that people want to bring the most up-to-date information they can find to DU. In principle, I'm absolutely not opposed to that. In practice, however, it means that some of the content now being brought to DU is being reposted from sources which are not appropriate for our community.

I am talking about social media sources which traffic in right-wing content, racist content, homophobic content, antisemitic content, and conspiracy content, including anti-vax conspiracy theories. Or, more often than not, all of the above.

I will note that DU's "Don't peddle right-wing talking points, smears, or sources" rule does carve out an exception for such sources:

Do not post right-wing talking points or smears. Do not post content sourced from right-wing publications, authors, or pundits. Exceptions are permitted if you provide a clear reason for doing so that is consistent with the values of this website.

Note that if you want to use a source which would typically be considered inappropriate for DU, you need to to give a clear reason for why you're doing it. If the purpose is to point out that MAGA media is turning against Trump, or if you want to highlight the awfulness of a particular X post by some right-wing public figure, then you need to give a clear explanation that that is your intent.

But simply reposting content from neo-Nazi or other extremist social media accounts, just because they've criticized Trump or other Republicans, or because they've posted an update about the war with Iran, does NOT count under the rule exception.

As you know, DU relies on the community to police itself via the Jury system. Of course, not all members serving on Juries are aware of whether certain X accounts are inappropriate, and people are often not likely to bother to check. This can make it easy for inappropriate sources to slip through. If Jury members see a post bashing Trump or Republicans, they are probably likely to think it's okay, and will be unlikely to click through to the X account only to find that it is selling white supremacist T-shirts.

So:

1) To DU members who are reposting content from social media: Please check your sources before posting to make sure that the source is appropriate for DU.

2) To DU members who are serving on Juries for the "Don't peddle right-wing talking points, smears, or sources" rule: Please don't just assume that a social media source is okay if it is bashing Trump -- actually check the source to make sure that it is appropriate for DU. If you do not wish to click through to a social media site to check the source, it is perfectly okay to cancel out of the Jury and let someone else take a look.

Thanks for reading, and for being part of the effort to keep DU clear of bigoted sources and content.
76 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Thanks for the clarification, EarlG UpInArms 19 hrs ago #1
Also, just stop posting content from the Nazi bar on DU. demmiblue 19 hrs ago #2
Yup, I would love no inks to Twitter at all obamanut2012 19 hrs ago #10
I won't click on any links to X. CaptainTruth 19 hrs ago #12
I put people who constantly post X content on ignore. demmiblue 19 hrs ago #15
I do that too. hunter 14 hrs ago #58
Same here. niyad 18 hrs ago #20
It's still the largest hub for news and commentary leftstreet 18 hrs ago #18
I don't think that is true anymore, sans the extreme right-wing content. demmiblue 18 hrs ago #26
That's great there's another source n/t leftstreet 18 hrs ago #28
It's also the best source for breaking financial and overseas news jmbar2 17 hrs ago #37
It is. Blue Sky is mostly a US thing. LeftInTX 11 hrs ago #65
Everyone??? ShazzieB 13 hrs ago #61
I go for breaking news. When we bombed Iran, I was on Flight Radar until Iran jammed the radars. LeftInTX 11 hrs ago #66
Thanks Earl Nittersing 19 hrs ago #3
I wish the Democracy Now! posts could be murielm99 19 hrs ago #4
That is a bit unfair jfz9580m 17 hrs ago #34
disagree Kali 15 hrs ago #55
I can not believe attacking democracy now is allowed here questionseverything 14 hrs ago #57
Democracy Now attacks Democrats! LeftInTX 11 hrs ago #67
It's a news show, letting people hear from lesser candidates on the ballot is what the news should do questionseverything 11 hrs ago #68
They do. And they constantly bash Democrats. LeftInTX 10 hrs ago #70
Democracy Now is kind of like how the evening news used to be AZProgressive 10 hrs ago #74
Not during the 2024 election. All they did was bash the Democrats. LeftInTX 10 hrs ago #76
Thanks, EarlG. greatauntoftriplets 19 hrs ago #5
K&R PatSeg 19 hrs ago #6
Thanks EarlG MustLoveBeagles 19 hrs ago #7
there has to be a "but" GusBob 19 hrs ago #8
Do you have specific examples in mind? niyad 19 hrs ago #11
because of course it NEVER happens ... stopdiggin 18 hrs ago #23
So asking for specific examples is denying the truth of the poster's niyad 18 hrs ago #24
No. but it IS often a tactic used to nullify, diminish or dismiss ... stopdiggin 18 hrs ago #31
I see. So showing where **I** have made such posts would be something niyad 17 hrs ago #39
"having accused me of such .. " stopdiggin 10 hrs ago #71
If it both takes you that long to find one example and is not worth your time to do so... W_HAMILTON 16 hrs ago #44
and 'rampant' was never mentioned, or really even implied, in either the post I replied to stopdiggin 10 hrs ago #72
So asking for specific examples is denying the truth of the poster's niyad 18 hrs ago #25
Yes I do GusBob 17 hrs ago #40
Not a problem. I simply wondered what I might have missed in the niyad 17 hrs ago #43
Don't fret wolfie001 12 hrs ago #62
Thank you, EarlG. Sadly, the list of trusted, reliable, ethical sources niyad 19 hrs ago #9
Roger that orangecrush 19 hrs ago #13
I never click on an X posting... MiHale 19 hrs ago #14
Actually, on each X post, you can click on Grok symbol to check womanofthehills 15 hrs ago #47
Is there a list of inimical sites for us naive jurors? dickthegrouch 18 hrs ago #16
I think he was talking about right wing sources ON some social media sites Kali 14 hrs ago #56
Problem is Independent journalists womanofthehills 10 hrs ago #73
yeah that is the beauty/"problem" with the jury system Kali 10 hrs ago #75
KnR Alice Kramden 18 hrs ago #17
It is getting much harder to tell truth from lies. BlueKota 18 hrs ago #19
"It is getting much harder to tell truth from lies." True Dough 18 hrs ago #30
Agreed! BlueKota 17 hrs ago #42
To be clear, and this is also addressed to one of the posts above, EarlG 17 hrs ago #32
A little confusing. LiberalLovinLug 13 hrs ago #60
The latter EarlG 11 hrs ago #64
You can click on Grok symbol on every X post womanofthehills 15 hrs ago #48
💯 💯 💯 💯 SSJVegeta 18 hrs ago #21
K&R Gets more important every day to maintain integrity...nt Wounded Bear 18 hrs ago #22
Thank you, EarlG!! nt PunkinPi 18 hrs ago #27
Thank you... This is my favorite place to get the latest news stories from all over the net.. Peacetrain 18 hrs ago #29
Thank you, EarlG. sueh 17 hrs ago #33
Please use in an appropriate forum too Marthe48 17 hrs ago #35
I verify most posts these days. Lots of clickbait. lindysalsagal 17 hrs ago #36
Thanks... 2naSalit 17 hrs ago #38
Most DUers have no desire to provide extra clicks to the right-wing media FakeNoose 17 hrs ago #41
Problem I've had in past womanofthehills 15 hrs ago #49
Always be sure the source is identified in your post FakeNoose 15 hrs ago #52
This sounds like Twitter/X in general: LudwigPastorius 16 hrs ago #45
Great to see this. Some of the sites have really offensive content, not just political but dehumanizing. JudyM 15 hrs ago #46
Here's a new tidbit. usonian 15 hrs ago #50
When you say "that site", it would be useful to specify which of the 2 sites you mention you are talking about muriel_volestrangler 15 hrs ago #54
K pwb 15 hrs ago #51
I'll stick with 'social media reposts are sloppy and lazy' and ignore them unless Torchlight 15 hrs ago #53
I see a lot of that from "the usual suspects" Skittles 13 hrs ago #59
Thank You for the PSA, EarlG... Cha 11 hrs ago #63
Thanks for the reminder, EarlG. B.See 11 hrs ago #69
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A reminder to all DUers r...