General Discussion

highplainsdem

(61,334 posts)

12. They don't all add disclaimers, though, here on DU or on other websites - and most of the time they

Sun Mar 1, 2026, 03:20 PM

7 hrs ago

leave the disclaimers off either for reasons of fraud (to seem more knowledgeable than they are) or for fear that their content will be ignored or dismissed as second-rate if they acknowledge it's AI.

And often the info that it's AI-generated is buried in fine print at the very end. I was very disappointed to discover last month that Newsweek is now publishing some AI-generated news stories. I wouldn't have noticed that if I hadn't read to the last word of a news story that had seemed oddly lacking in some details I'd have expected a reporter to ask about.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

4 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Chin music SheltieLover Wednesdays SergeStorms

64 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Please do not post AI-generated text, whether OPs or replies, without labeling them AI-generated and naming the AI used. [View all] highplainsdem 9 hrs ago OP

Absolutely! pat_k 8 hrs ago #1

I'm glad you label it, but why bother posting what any chatbot says when it might give a different answer highplainsdem 7 hrs ago #7

Very true. AI generated content looks and sounds authoritative, even when it's not mdbl 7 hrs ago #10

I always question AI - ask for quotes, womanofthehills 7 hrs ago #14

That will NOT prevent it from lying. Ms. Toad 5 hrs ago #35

This is an AI Video... leftstreet 8 hrs ago #2

It's still slop. It's still dumb. Our most effective weapons against Trump and his regime are real news, highplainsdem 8 hrs ago #3

I thought the subject was labeling it leftstreet 8 hrs ago #5

I'm glad you agree with the labeling. I thought you posted that video as something that you felt highplainsdem 7 hrs ago #8

bwahahaha jmbar2 8 hrs ago #4

No way ornotna 1 hr ago #62

With some small effort one can usually find the source of this plagiarized material. hunter 8 hrs ago #6

Ah, Liechtenstein! kurtyboy 7 hrs ago #18

I agree, but...... SergeStorms 7 hrs ago #9

They don't all add disclaimers, though, here on DU or on other websites - and most of the time they highplainsdem 7 hrs ago #12

I agree SergeStorms 5 hrs ago #34

Thanks! highplainsdem 4 hrs ago #53

Thank you !!!! This should be a DU rule. Trueblue1968 7 hrs ago #11

Yes! SheltieLover 6 hrs ago #21

If people are posting AI generated text here withour saying it's AI, I agree that it should be labeled as such. ShazzieB 7 hrs ago #13

The AI overview is there to keep you in the google sandbox. hunter 5 hrs ago #47

Yes, and No ThreeNoSeep 7 hrs ago #15

Yes, they are committing fraud, i.e. plagurisim. paleotn 6 hrs ago #25

Academic researchers use other people's work all the time. (#bibliography) ThreeNoSeep 3 hrs ago #59

They cite other people's work. Other PEOPLE. Cite LLMs? paleotn 3 hrs ago #60

Theft? Nope. ThreeNoSeep 1 hr ago #61

I'm sorry, but you're wrong. highplainsdem 6 hrs ago #28

Where are your citations for the above? jmbar2 5 hrs ago #39

Citations for what's in the excerpt boxes? Those are quotes from the message I was replying to. highplainsdem 5 hrs ago #43

They're quotes, so they need ____________________ jmbar2 5 hrs ago #45

Not when it's a quote from someone I'm replying to in an excerpt box in a reply following their message. highplainsdem 4 hrs ago #49

Agree 100%. Thank you! CaptainTruth 7 hrs ago #16

Is this a new rule or guideline? Joinfortmill 7 hrs ago #17

If not, should be. paleotn 6 hrs ago #22

I have no issue with this if it is a rule by the site owner Joinfortmill 6 hrs ago #23

They're wishing, not presenting. paleotn 6 hrs ago #26

You might want to read my post again. Joinfortmill 6 hrs ago #27

Do they have the ability to make policy? No. Then it's just wishing. paleotn 6 hrs ago #29

Read it. Joinfortmill 6 hrs ago #32

It's a request, starting with the word "please" - no more a rule or guideline than the many requests highplainsdem 5 hrs ago #33

Chill. Why the freaking anger? paleotn 5 hrs ago #36

I'm not angry. Joinfortmill 5 hrs ago #44

Then why is this such an issue for you? Seriously? paleotn 4 hrs ago #56

It is the way it was presented. Joinfortmill 3 hrs ago #57

It's a request, made because we have had chatbot responses posted here that weren't identified as highplainsdem 6 hrs ago #31

Perfectly good reasons why we should NEVER use AI for this forum. paleotn 6 hrs ago #19

Absolutely agreed! SheltieLover 6 hrs ago #20

Is this like blaming someone for holding a counterfeit banknote? Drum 6 hrs ago #24

I simply put many of these AI enthusiasts on my ignore list. hunter 5 hrs ago #40

Agreed! Drum 5 hrs ago #42

It's possible I decry this new industry more than highplainsdem does. hunter 4 hrs ago #55

Amen. Wednesdays 6 hrs ago #30

I'm here for the humans. carpetbagger 5 hrs ago #37

LOL! I hope we all are. Heaven help this board if very much of it turns into a place to trade highplainsdem 5 hrs ago #38

Do we need to know the political affiliation of the chatbot? MichMan 5 hrs ago #41

And their pronouns jmbar2 5 hrs ago #46

This isn't in the TOS. It's a request made for the reasons explained in the OP. And identifying the chatbot helps highplainsdem 4 hrs ago #50

I come to DU to find out what other people think. AI doesn't think. It's "artificial!" nt LAS14 4 hrs ago #48

Exactly. There are already too many responses from bots in a lot of other online forums. highplainsdem 3 hrs ago #58

I ask that an AI tag be added to the subject line so those of us who find AI revolting can easily Trash it a SheltieLover 4 hrs ago #51

I think a trigger warning might be more appropriate jmbar2 4 hrs ago #52

It's not a trigger for me, but AI in subject makes it easier to trash in settings. SheltieLover 4 hrs ago #54

I'm starting to think you don't care about any other issue. FascismIsDeath 1 hr ago #63

Really? I've posted about lots of other issues, here and on other platforms. highplainsdem 10 min ago #64