Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MadameButterfly

(3,938 posts)
30. Yes, we can. It's inevitable. But
Wed Feb 25, 2026, 06:32 PM
18 hrs ago

maybe not now, with democracy at stake?

And just because Obama, who was beyond perfect, got elected, doesn't make it safe to nominate a Black man. Or a gay man. How about a Democratic Socialist? Can we risk a Californian or does it need to be someone from a swing state? I thought we were over the Jewish thing, but with antisemitism on the rise on one side and Gaza on the other--i just don't know. Being overweight might be acceptable, but there is some risk there too. Taft didn't have to go on TV. There will be a new litmus test for age, and maybe everyone will have to make their medical records public.

Once you've considered all the prejudices, hardly anyone is left. But for that, I'd say we have a deep bench of talented, courageous potential candidates in the Democratic Party.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

But we can't have a female President, right? [View all] senseandsensibility 22 hrs ago OP
Rec for "it's a damn shame". Truer words never spoken. Whyisthisstillclose 22 hrs ago #1
I'd like to believe that we could Bettie 22 hrs ago #2
I feel similarly senseandsensibility 22 hrs ago #3
Yes, we can. It's inevitable. But MadameButterfly 18 hrs ago #30
Spanberger just got to the Governor's office Fiendish Thingy 21 hrs ago #4
The same people who are pushing talking points to discourage women from running Quiet Em 21 hrs ago #5
Well, sometimes reality has a way of overtaking "conventional wisdom" senseandsensibility 21 hrs ago #7
I still am optimistic because anything can happen and all the changes we are and will go thru until 2028 Deuxcents 12 hrs ago #38
No one is running yet. Not even Newsom. maxsolomon 21 hrs ago #6
I wish this rhetoric would stop here TheProle 21 hrs ago #8
This message was self-deleted by its author PeaceWave 20 hrs ago #10
Not really. Torchlight 18 hrs ago #35
I loved what I heard from the governor BaronChocula 20 hrs ago #9
No, we can't get the red out 20 hrs ago #11
I think we are fooling ourselves if we ignore or refuse to admit senseandsensibility 19 hrs ago #24
Agree get the red out 7 hrs ago #39
Two capable women Aviation Pro 20 hrs ago #12
Careful what to wish for. The Grand Illuminist 20 hrs ago #13
And that has Nothing to do with Cha 20 hrs ago #18
The first female POTUS will be a GOPer leftstreet 20 hrs ago #14
I will continue to support women candidates. The consequences of NOT going with the woman are becoming... NNadir 20 hrs ago #15
To me she didn't project strength. Hieronymus Phact 20 hrs ago #16
Oh please... Are you saying the "They're eating the dogs" orange guy projected "strength?" NNadir 4 hrs ago #41
believe it or not Hieronymus Phact 3 hrs ago #42
Well I haven't "learned" anything from this comment irrespective of a claim... NNadir 3 hrs ago #43
"weak perceptual abilities" Nice way to insult someone. Hieronymus Phact 2 hrs ago #45
I'm with you. And WHY is a male candidate playing it safe? We need to get over the hidden misogyny, dammit. Joinfortmill 20 hrs ago #17
Running as "a woman" is asking to lose gulliver 20 hrs ago #19
she could be the dark horse. nt Javaman 20 hrs ago #20
Just watched she rocked it. ALBliberal 19 hrs ago #21
Governor Spanberger is too moderate for many here. TomSlick 19 hrs ago #22
I'm on the progressive side but I would vote for her senseandsensibility 19 hrs ago #25
I'm unprepared to commit until we know who is running in the primary. TomSlick 19 hrs ago #28
Yeah, the same. senseandsensibility 19 hrs ago #29
Too much time. TomSlick 18 hrs ago #32
In most other places, it's not an issue. But by comparison the U.S. is a backward country. I don't see a woman getting Fil1957 19 hrs ago #23
That's WHY misogynist men don't want WOMEN To LEAD! Bread and Circuses 19 hrs ago #26
This message was self-deleted by its author senseandsensibility 19 hrs ago #27
They left out the "n" at the end of Misogynist Men. maxsolomon 18 hrs ago #33
Okay, thanks. senseandsensibility 18 hrs ago #34
Remember "Killer Kamala" and the ugly chants of... QueerDuck 18 hrs ago #31
Couple thoughts BlueHurricane 14 hrs ago #36
Can we quit trying to get the "first women" kwolf68 14 hrs ago #37
Little girls care obamanut2012 5 hrs ago #40
No SocialDemocrat61 3 hrs ago #44
There's an assumption for some that a woman candidate is only running as "a woman" when she's doing no such thing, betsuni 1 hr ago #46
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»But we can't have a femal...»Reply #30