Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bigtree

(93,849 posts)
11. Epstein-related files could not be legally released during Garland's term because Maxwell's case was still under appeal
Wed Feb 25, 2026, 03:13 PM
10 hrs ago

....but let's just run with this fact-free innuendo against Garland.

Better yet, let's take focus off of this Trump controlled DOJ and their responsibility for presently violating the law just passed that mandates release of all files.

Let's focus on something that invites a 'both sides' deflection which has already been addressed by Merrick Garland.


Holder and Garland deny knowledge of Epstein files in letters to House Oversight Committee

"Although I cannot rule out that I ever received a status update on matters pertaining to Mr. Epstein or Ms. Maxwell in my role as Attorney General, I do not recall any such update or any other kind of report," Garland wrote to the committee.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/holder-and-garland-deny-knowledge-of-epstein-files-in-letters-to-house-oversight-committee/ar-AA1NH0iG


...we can call Garland a liar on this without any proof presented at all, or, we can look at some facts:


julie k. brown* @jkbjournalist
Again...the Epstein case was still an OPEN criminal investigation during the Biden administration. They had an open grand jury ... And even after Maxwell's conviction, the case was on appeal -- anyone in law enforcement knows you don't open your case file when it's still under appeal. There were still victims going to the FBI with new information. That changed when Trump's DOJ reviewed the files and closed the case in July. · Nov 17, 2025

*Miami Herald journalist whose investigation led to the arrests of Jeffrey Epstein & Ghislaine Maxwell. Author, "Perversion of Justice."

JB quoted: "There were still victims going to the FBI with new information. That changed when Trump's DOJ reviewed the files and closed the case in July."
https://www.unilad.com/news/us-news/why-biden-didnt-release-epstein-files-377071-20251120

Recommendations

9 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Oh BeyondGeography 11 hrs ago #1
DURec leftstreet 11 hrs ago #2
Great idea! And while they're at it, please subpoena whomever at SDNY requested NM to stop ranch investigation in 2019 SheltieLover 11 hrs ago #3
Years of silence Tetrachloride 11 hrs ago #4
Merrick Garland also has standing Mblaze 11 hrs ago #5
Lol. msfiddlestix 11 hrs ago #6
Agree. Spineless weasels like Garland never stand up for anything. BannonsLiver 10 hrs ago #19
he's trying to appear even-handed here bigtree 9 hrs ago #27
Bill Barr needs to be deposed. poli-junkie 11 hrs ago #7
Yes, Barr and Garland both need to testify FakeNoose 10 hrs ago #13
This!!!!! 👆👆👆👆👆👆👆 SheltieLover 7 hrs ago #52
Gooooood! Prairie Gates 11 hrs ago #8
🤞🤞🤞🤞🤞🤞🤞🤞 Whyisthisstillclose 10 hrs ago #9
Merrick Garland would take the 5th... Escape 10 hrs ago #10
Merrick Garland has never and would never take the 5th. SunSeeker 10 hrs ago #12
Thank you. Well said Raven123 9 hrs ago #26
Epstein-related files could not be legally released during Garland's term because Maxwell's case was still under appeal bigtree 10 hrs ago #11
Here comes the Garland Society. BannonsLiver 10 hrs ago #14
There is certainly grounds for criticizing Garland for his slow prosecution of Trump, but not for this. SunSeeker 9 hrs ago #22
I've heard all those excuses and rationalizations before. BannonsLiver 9 hrs ago #24
Those are not "rationalizations" about the handling of the Epstein files, they're facts. SunSeeker 9 hrs ago #39
When Bondi threw Garland's name at Ted Lieu he didn't disagree with her premise that Garland was delinquent on Epstein BeyondGeography 9 hrs ago #41
Ted Lieu was not implying Garland should have disclosed the Epstein files. SunSeeker 8 hrs ago #44
Exactly. Thank you bigtree. He didn't want to comment because it could endanger the conviction, which was on appeal. SunSeeker 10 hrs ago #16
this expectation of some is a degeneration of norms bigtree 9 hrs ago #23
Sounds sorta like can't fight the fire until the house KPN 10 hrs ago #21
I may have a different interpretation of 'still interviewing witnesses' than you bigtree 9 hrs ago #25
There's some management tools called priorities, assignment of resources, KPN 9 hrs ago #28
none of which have been shown by anyone to have been neglected or mismanaged bigtree 9 hrs ago #31
You have your opinion. I have mine. This was a big deal as KPN 9 hrs ago #38
I literally said none was shown bigtree 8 hrs ago #42
You can't show something that is missing -- like higher priority, greater emphasis, etc. I don't isolate everything to KPN 7 hrs ago #45
we're only talking about points and processes of law. What does 'proof' have to do with all that, you say? bigtree 7 hrs ago #48
Instead of escalating and projecting -- as in "obfuscating", KPN 2 hrs ago #54
the projection here is against Garland bigtree 34 min ago #55
Mmmhmmm. KPN 21 min ago #56
UH OH, Escape 10 hrs ago #15
I like to call it the Garland Society. BannonsLiver 10 hrs ago #18
Yes, and isn't it amazing... Escape 7 hrs ago #46
Interesting question. BannonsLiver 7 hrs ago #49
One million files and nothing was done The Blue Flower 10 hrs ago #17
Incompetence or worse? KPN 9 hrs ago #29
Blaming Biden's DOJ is everywhere on right wing social media. progressoid 10 hrs ago #20
Lol. In some ways, I can't disagree. KPN 9 hrs ago #30
We need to have a GOOD answer to this or it will cost us in the election. Currently our answer is that Scrivener7 9 hrs ago #35
THIS. Absolutely. Shed the thin skin and blinders. KPN 7 hrs ago #47
Instead of wasting time on Garland... appmanga 9 hrs ago #32
This. Good idea. Scrivener7 9 hrs ago #34
THIS SunSeeker 9 hrs ago #40
Garland won't tell us anything. Bring on Jack Smith to talk about his investigations. Scrivener7 9 hrs ago #33
The deep of corruption in the current and former DOJ is very enlightening. Pretty obvious walkingman 9 hrs ago #36
Brilliant idea xuplate 9 hrs ago #37
Well there's at least one thing MAGAts and Dems appear to agree on MorbidButterflyTat 8 hrs ago #43
It's essentially spring in my area already. BannonsLiver 7 hrs ago #50
So should Barr!!! SheltieLover 7 hrs ago #51
AGREE ! republianmushroom 5 hrs ago #53
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Top Oversight Democrat sa...»Reply #11