Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

muriel_volestrangler

(105,185 posts)
18. I think this was caused by the email hoping to "play some more soon" with Epstein, after Andrew claimed he had cut off
Thu Oct 30, 2025, 05:25 PM
Oct 30

contact.

Prince Andrew told Jeffrey Epstein in an email “we are in this together” after a picture of the British royal with his arm around a teenage Virginia Giuffre was first published in 2011.

The email will pile further pressure on the Duke of York and the royal family because he previously told the BBC he had ceased contact with the convicted child sex offender by that point.
...
Andrew emailed Epstein on 28 February 2011, the day after the well-known photograph of the duke, Giuffre and Ghislaine Maxwell was made public. He told Epstein to “keep in close touch” and expressed a wish to “play some more soon”.
...
But he wrote to Epstein in the message after the photo was published: “I’m just as concerned for you! Don’t worry about me! It would seem we are in this together and will have to rise above it. Otherwise keep in close touch and we’ll play some more soon!!!!”

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2025/oct/12/prince-andrew-told-jeffrey-epstein-were-in-this-together-in-2011-email

So this shows that his claim that he'd gone to New York to say he would break all contact with Epstein (when they were photographed in Central Park) was a tissue of lies; and the "play some more soon" is, in the context of Epstein, depraved. Whether they have any more as yet unpublished evidence, that really was enough for them to need to push him as far away as they could.

I wouldn't put this quite on the Mary and Elizabeth scale (and I'd say that Mary II and her husband William III invading to depose her father James II/VII was more dramatic in 1689, while being "internal" in a sense). It's at the scale of Edward VIII and Wallis Simpson; on the face of it, more dramatic, since they hadn't done anything wrong, though him being later seen as Nazi-curious gave that a lot of importance after the fact.

Recommendations

4 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Well, to be fair, it didn't seem as if Queen Elizabeth had it in her to no_hypocrisy Oct 30 #1
He was her favorite LittleGirl Oct 30 #15
It is a damn shame that our President and wannabe king has less honor than he actual King of England. Moostache Oct 30 #21
Charles is not a fan of Trump either SocialDemocrat61 Oct 30 #34
The perv formally known as Prince! El Supremo Oct 30 #2
I now crown you, Perv Andrew! Publish it throughout the land! n/t Jacson6 Oct 30 #6
He may not be a prince MurrayDelph Oct 30 #28
Wonder if "King Donald I" will do the honorable thing and resign? walkingman Oct 30 #3
Damn. Has the Royal Family seen this kind of internal drama since... Volaris Oct 30 #4
Yes more info to drop? Irish_Dem Oct 30 #9
The book was published Oct 21st LittleGirl Oct 30 #16
Nobodys Girl? or the british one? Volaris Oct 30 #22
Nobody's Girl. nt LittleGirl Oct 30 #41
Im half done with it. Its a pretty rough read. Volaris Oct 30 #43
There are some things I need to read LittleGirl Oct 30 #45
I think this was caused by the email hoping to "play some more soon" with Epstein, after Andrew claimed he had cut off muriel_volestrangler Oct 30 #18
I'm sure it's about the book pinkstarburst Oct 30 #19
That makes sense, but does william even want the job, at this point? Volaris Oct 30 #23
Yes William is fully committed to doing the job he was trained to do. Irish_Dem Oct 30 #38
Got it. Volaris Oct 30 #42
I am on a couple of British forums. Irish_Dem Oct 31 #47
Edward VIII? SocialDemocrat61 Oct 30 #35
Oh for sure! hedda_foil Oct 30 #36
Yes canetoad Oct 30 #44
Mary Ii and Anne overthrowing their father Retrograde Oct 31 #46
Thats gonna hurt. Apprently he likes to say "im a prince born" and has DOY license plates BlueWaveNeverEnd Oct 30 #5
He is entitled, arrogant, obnoxious. Irish_Dem Oct 30 #10
Not nearly enough, though. 2naSalit Oct 30 #17
Yes he belongs in prison. Irish_Dem Oct 30 #24
Slap on the fucking wrist. Brenda Oct 30 #7
If its this bad in the UK, what does this mean for donnie t? RT Atlanta Oct 30 #8
Randy Andy's hittin the bricks. BannonsLiver Oct 30 #11
Good, sounds like they are moving to other homes within the Crown Estates...Still quite roomy and free of charge so, meh wcmagumba Oct 30 #12
Recall the relationship Charles and other royals had with Jimmy Savile. nt PufPuf23 Oct 30 #13
Savile sounds like the u.k. version of epstein. mwmisses4289 Oct 30 #30
Makes you wonder what new revelations are going to come out Warpy Oct 30 #14
Does he have any means of making a living? question everything Oct 30 #20
He may get a small allowance as long as he shuts up and keeps his head down. Irish_Dem Oct 30 #39
I just read comments by UK citizens and they HATE him BigmanPigman Oct 30 #25
I would like to see Andy Windsor.... mwooldri Oct 30 #27
That would be a step in the right direction BigmanPigman Oct 30 #29
Yes there are four royals the Brits hate with a passion. Irish_Dem Oct 30 #40
I wouldn't give Charles too much credit. nycbos Oct 30 #26
And yet King Charles just hosted trump at windsor castle. He should've IcyPeas Oct 30 #31
He can't do that SocialDemocrat61 Oct 30 #37
He'll write the tell-all books of tell-all books. I can't wait Buckeyeblue Oct 30 #32
This story makes me wonder. Collimator Oct 30 #33
This message was self-deleted by its author mucholderthandirt Oct 31 #49
Woah! I didn't think they could remove his title as a prince, since he was born to a monarch. mucholderthandirt Oct 31 #48
lrony strikes again: Andrew is banished while Maxwell is rewarded with a move allegorical oracle Oct 31 #50
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»King Charles III strips P...»Reply #18