Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)"Bonkers" - what other architects think about the design of Trump's White House ballroom (2xUpdated) [View all]
"Bonkers" - what other architects think about the design of Trump's White House ballroom (2xUpdated)
by davidkc
Wednesday, October 22, 2025 at 9:44:27a EDT

McCrery's former mentor calls his WH ballroom design "bonkers"; an architecture newsletter says it "violates the very standards of beauty and proportion"
snip//
The broader architecture community does not have much nice to say about McCrerys White House ballroom design or about how he was chosen. Punch List notes that the American Institute of Architects sent a letter to the Committee for the Preservation of the White House in which it raised alarms about several aspects of the ballroom plan.
Though it is couched in diplomatic language, the letter calls out the administration for choosing McCrery without an open public process and raises questions about what it calls the designs scale and balance: We urge careful consideration of adjustments that would align the proposed additions more closely with the White Houses historic character.
McCrerys former mentor, famed architect Peter Eisenman, was less diplomatic.
(Eisenman) called McCrerys ballroom design bonkers before adding, putting a portico at the end of a long facade and not in the center is what one might say is untutored.
Ouch.
The author of the Punch List piece, Christopher Hawthorne, agrees with the criticism:
I dont disagree with the growing consensus that the ballroom design, a big-footed architectural presence stomping toward the southern edge of the White House grounds, violates the very standards of beauty and proportion that McCrery loves to rhapsodize about in interviews, to say nothing of the protocols long in place to guide changes to 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. Im also of course reminded of the heavily gilded architecture that Viktor Orbáns autocratic government coaxed from the typically more subtle Sou Fujimoto in Budapest...
Hawthorne goes on to say even more pointedly that what McCrerys ballroom design suggests is not so much a bloated classicism or an effort to turn Washington into Mar-a-Lago north, although it is both of those things, as a blueprint for making concrete the notion that the White House has turned in some fundamental sense into a retail outlet, a place where access and influence are nakedly bought and sold.
more...
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2025/10/22/2349807/-Bonkers-what-other-architects-think-about-the-design-of-Trump-s-ballroom?pm_campaign=front_page&pm_source=trending&pm_medium=web
26 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"Bonkers" - what other architects think about the design of Trump's White House ballroom (2xUpdated) [View all]
babylonsister
Thursday
OP
Its "scale and balance" are the most jarring, the monstrosity dwarfs the main residence.
sop
Thursday
#1
It's a factory feedlot for rich donors. Pack 'em in and harvest 'em, don't sweat the niceties.
eppur_se_muova
Thursday
#20