Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(36,346 posts)

4. They have ruled

Fri Jun 27, 2025, 11:46 AM

Jun 27

that Constitutional Rights are subject to selective enforcement by District and not universal. It is more devastating that it appears.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

20 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I disagree JustAnotherGen Jun 27 #1

Yeah, I am going with their dissent... Hugin Jun 27 #2

Ian Millhiser, "random journo"? mahatmakanejeeves Jun 27 #8

Ian Millhiser is no "random journo." Ocelot II Jun 27 #14

We've reached the point where if he's not on the SCOTUS. Hugin Jun 27 #17

Yep. It's now "catch me if you can" rule of law. Hassin Bin Sober Jun 27 #6

They have ruled edhopper Jun 27 #4

This message was self-deleted by its author surfered Jun 27 #5

This is worth reading - a sensible perspective. Ocelot II Jun 27 #9

Thanks for the archive. I swear it wasn't paywalled when I posted it 😂 In It to Win It Jun 27 #11

Maybe it's only paywalled for me? Ocelot II Jun 27 #12

I just clicked the link again. It's paywalled now. In It to Win It Jun 27 #13

They busted you. Ocelot II Jun 27 #15

I've said this before canetoad Jun 27 #19

Thank you. I generally try to keep the fire from other people's hair Ocelot II Jun 27 #20

Since this administration has shown contempt for due process , surfered Jun 27 #10

He's giving this court the benefit of the doubt Arazi Jun 27 #16