Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This message was self-deleted by its author [View all]JI7
(92,327 posts)88. The reason for this is to free up traffic. They will of course use the money made
towards public transport but it's not itself going to fund it.
I'm not sure what the situation is in New York but I assume they already have many people that already take public transportation unlike in Los Angeles.
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
88 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

You do realize that things like that really aren't under the control of the mayor, right? n/t
markpkessinger
Jun 24
#66
He has a great platform and an interesting background. As a Jew I have no problem supporting him. If
Nanjeanne
Jun 24
#5
Maybe the establishment thought a verified sex pest was a bridge too far and stayed home.
Hassin Bin Sober
Jun 24
#31
That was bad optics, wasn't it?? when it came to the sexual harassment thing...
Jack Valentino
Jun 24
#40
LOL. Enjoy your stay! That's a silly CT started years ago by a nutty RW talk radio guy.
PSPS
Jun 24
#32