Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: There appears to be misiniformation stating there was no ceasefire, despite evidence. [View all]vanessa_ca
(299 posts)33. Need a better source. Iran International does not speak for Iran. Not a legitimate channel for this purpose.
It's a London/Washington DC/Israeli front headquartered in London (and sometimes DC), established in 2017. It's the equivalent of quoting Reza Pahlavi.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
42 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

There appears to be misiniformation stating there was no ceasefire, despite evidence. [View all]
Renew Deal
Jun 24
OP
Tehran Times is closely linked to the Iranian Government. Just reporting what they said.
chia
Jun 24
#39
Do you trust anyone in this? Trump? Israel? Iran? All I know is every single outlet after Trump's announcement
chia
Jun 24
#42
And the subtitle translating what he said is: Now gimme my Nobel Peace Prize check.
Attilatheblond
Jun 24
#26
At least in the initial part when it was announced, I think most had a justifiable skepticism because of trump's
lostincalifornia
Jun 24
#6
You might want to hold off on the accusations given that your evidence is a UK-based outlet with no direct ties to Iran.
W_HAMILTON
Jun 24
#25
What about it? Both countries have attacked each other after the time that tweet was sent.
W_HAMILTON
Jun 24
#31
That was right after Trump's announcement. The articles an hour later softened the tone
vanessa_ca
Jun 24
#35
Need a better source. Iran International does not speak for Iran. Not a legitimate channel for this purpose.
vanessa_ca
Jun 24
#33
Don't move the goalposts. You wrote "Iran acknowledged the ceasefire via multiple channels including this one"
vanessa_ca
Jun 24
#36
Touche on the better source, but it was an acknowledgement after the ceasefire started
vanessa_ca
Jun 24
#38