Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Rhiannon12866

(245,488 posts)
Thu Oct 23, 2025, 07:55 PM 17 hrs ago

Trump tanks! 47 now below Biden's low as when he quit after debate - The Beat - MSNBC



Trump's disapproval rating has slumped to a new low for this term. MSNBC's Ari Melber reports. - Aired on 10/22/2025.
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump tanks! 47 now below Biden's low as when he quit after debate - The Beat - MSNBC (Original Post) Rhiannon12866 17 hrs ago OP
The more I think about it, the more I think VMA131Marine 17 hrs ago #1
Roads not taken. OAITW r.2.0 17 hrs ago #2
Hard to know if that would have helped karynnj 16 hrs ago #3
Congressional approval is not required to swear in a VP VMA131Marine 14 hrs ago #4
I meant it would be needed for a person chosen by Harris to be VP karynnj 13 hrs ago #5

VMA131Marine

(5,109 posts)
1. The more I think about it, the more I think
Thu Oct 23, 2025, 08:00 PM
17 hrs ago

President Biden should have resigned the Presidency when he quit the race. Kamala Harris would have been able to campaign as the incumbent and she would not have been precluded from seeking two full terms. It would have cemented Biden’s legacy in leading the first female president.

karynnj

(60,600 posts)
3. Hard to know if that would have helped
Thu Oct 23, 2025, 09:45 PM
16 hrs ago

Last edited Thu Oct 23, 2025, 11:57 PM - Edit history (1)

On one hand, you would have her being sworn in. Before a VP that she would choose could be sworn in Congressional approval would be needed.

Being President goes both ways. She gets to be seen being the President. However, it also means that she would be the one deciding things like what to do on Israel, which was a landmine.

Any way, this was not the road taken

VMA131Marine

(5,109 posts)
4. Congressional approval is not required to swear in a VP
Thu Oct 23, 2025, 10:56 PM
14 hrs ago

It certainly wasn’t required for LBJ who was sworn in on Air Force One in Dallas, nor was it required for Gerald Ford.
The VP has two constitutional duties and the first one is to replace the President if he/she can no longer perform the duties of his office. Imagine the chaos that would likely result if Congress has to approve the VPs swearing in after the death or resignation of a President.

karynnj

(60,600 posts)
5. I meant it would be needed for a person chosen by Harris to be VP
Thu Oct 23, 2025, 11:56 PM
13 hrs ago

Ford needed to get approval for Rockefeller. I think there were no provisions when LBJ became President so there was no VP for a time.
Looking back, I wrote my post very poorly so it was not clear I was speaking of Walz or whoever she chose. Thank you for correcting what I wrote. I changed my post to make it clearer. The point was that the Republicans would probably not confirm anyone, leaving her as VP. The danger would be that puts Speaker Johnson as first in line.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Cable News Clips»Trump tanks! 47 now below...