Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Cable News Clips
Related: About this forumWATCH: Gabbard says Signal group chat on Yemen strikes had 'discussion around targets in general' - PBS NewsHour
Sen. Mark Kelly, D-Ariz., asked national security officials on Tuesday whether a Signal group chat about U.S. military attack plans that inadvertently included a journalist included discussion of targets in Yemen.
I believe there was discussion around targets in general, U.S. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard said during a hearing before the Senate Intelligence Committee.
When asked the same question, CIA Director John Ratcliffe said that was consistent with my recollection.
The hearing, which came a day after the existence of the group chat was reported in The Atlantic, focused on worldwide threats. Testifying alongside Gabbard and Ratcliffe were FBI Director Kash Patel, NSA Director Timothy Haugh and Defense Intelligence Agency Director Jeffrey Kruse.
In the time since the group chat was reported, national security experts and lawmakers have expressed concern about the major lapse in security.
When asked by reporters about the communications around the plans late Monday, Hegseth said nobody was texting war plans. - Aired on 03/25/2025.
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

WATCH: Gabbard says Signal group chat on Yemen strikes had 'discussion around targets in general' - PBS NewsHour (Original Post)
Rhiannon12866
Mar 26
OP
Thanks! And obviously these nominees are completely unqualified to protect national security
Rhiannon12866
Mar 26
#2
LogDog75
(393 posts)1. Obviously, she and her cocinspitators hadn't heard of OPSEC or COMSEC
OPSEC stands for Operational Security which basically is denying an adversary of information regarding capabilities, intentions, planning, and execution of national and operational security plans.
COMSEC is Communication Security which is the protection of all forms of communication by our adversaries as well as other nations and non-nation actors.
Using an unauthorized and non-secured app to communicate violates both OPSEC and COMSEC. Had these idiots been in the military, they would have been arrested, in jail, and awaiting a court martial.
Rhiannon12866
(232,375 posts)2. Thanks! And obviously these nominees are completely unqualified to protect national security
I'd say that they need to be fired and replaced, but if it's up to TFG to choose their replacements, they could even be far worse.