History of Feminism
Related: About this forum
MadrasT
(7,237 posts)It's perfect-- even to the characters
arcane1
(38,613 posts)
ismnotwasm
(42,628 posts)For now
arcane1
(38,613 posts)But it's probably a good thing I didn't get to read their post(s)
ismnotwasm
(42,628 posts)arcane1
(38,613 posts)
ismnotwasm
(42,628 posts)
Response to ismnotwasm (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Response to ismnotwasm (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Turns out to be the mace.
Response to Spitfire of ATJ (Reply #7)
Name removed Message auto-removed
malthaussen
(18,072 posts)I don't think the objection is really "because then I might not get to fuck her." I think the objection is rather "But that means I have to actually make an effort to relate to her."
-- Mal
mountain grammy
(27,699 posts)or, far too often, in real life characters.
malthaussen
(18,072 posts)That certainly wasn't my intent. Although I suppose if the guy cannot really comprehend relating to another person, he wouldn't be able to absorb the idea of a relationship being necessary (to say nothing of rewarding).
-- Mal
mountain grammy
(27,699 posts)"he wouldn't be able to absorb the idea..." etc.
noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)
calimary
(85,879 posts)


ismnotwasm
(42,628 posts)we've been told, female and male that we don't think alike, that women have less of sex so drive than men, both ideas that are beng reexamined
First, men and women do think much alike, I think it's when relationships get intimate-- no matter what the gender, that differences become apparent, second women, like men have varying degrees of 'sex drives' but women tend not to have the social pressure to 'get laid' that men do, instead have social pressure not to. We're at a bit of a crossroads gender wise, and the 'rules' are not so much changing as morphing into unrecognizable ideals.
So the guy in the cartoon is situational, he's not loking to "relate" as much he's truly lookng to get laid. Not, shall we say, exactly boyfriend material or even, most likely much good for a zipless fuck (to quote Erica Jong)
Skittles
(163,403 posts)it's not that men are pressured to "get laid" - it's that women are pressured to NOT get laid - by being labeled as loose women, sluts, etc. Also, men don't worry so much that the gal he's with could seriously injure or kill him.
ismnotwasm
(42,628 posts)Men pressure to
Women pressure not to
Poorly worded sorry
malthaussen
(18,072 posts)But maybe that pressure isn't so great now. OTOH, I don't see much in modern culture that indicates a belief that women are good for much else...
-- Mal
malthaussen
(18,072 posts)In either event, spending even two minutes finding out who she is is not something in which our hero has an interest.
I had an interesting discussion with Redqueen awhile back. Reddit had had a marathon of men posting their experiences of raping women. One guy made a point which struck around this area: he didn't want to look at the woman's face. Pretty depersonalizing, nyet? And rather an extreme case of someone who doesn't want to relate.
-- Mal
Response to malthaussen (Reply #12)
Name removed Message auto-removed
mopinko
(72,244 posts)lucky for my ex this is not the law.
Response to ismnotwasm (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
ismnotwasm
(42,628 posts)
arcane1
(38,613 posts)
I just alerted on one of the fools.
shenmue
(38,542 posts)That's the only good part.
MIRT is well aware of them, him, it whatever.
shenmue
(38,542 posts)the one from the first post?
I think he was banned before I finished typing out my alert request.
He's a little OCD or something. He's down as a person(s) that MIRT watches for. And today has been busy
shenmue
(38,542 posts)
Response to shenmue (Reply #29)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Response to ismnotwasm (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)I have to second the statement that the last panel isn't an accurate depiction of the "reasons." i think Malthaussen nailed it pretty well - the objection isn't that he "won't get to fuck her," the objection is that he's being asked tothink of someone other htna himself, in particular a woman.
ismnotwasm
(42,628 posts)Between sexism and misogyny, I do agree, since they are not the same things.
MadrasT
(7,237 posts)
malthaussen
(18,072 posts)Wonder what would happen if this was posted in GD!
-- Mal
ismnotwasm
(42,628 posts)Is mostly a waste of time.
I like conversations, not whatever it is they think they're doing there. Once in awhile it gets real so it's not a total loss