History of Feminism
Related: About this forumINDIAN AD TURNS THE MALE GAZE BACK ON ITSELF AND IT'S AWESOME
The Asian film school Whistling Woods is concerned with another kind of "slipper slope" (sic).
The video is great, both in its very realistic and uncomfortable portrayal of men staring at young women, and also in the message it is trying to send, namely You look ridiculous and creepy, and we can see you. All too often, not just in India but all over the world, it seems that men looking at women in public places somehow think they are watching a display, as though women exist on a television screen. When, of course, in reality, women can see the people staring at them just fine, and those stares can make us feel not only uncomfortable and objectified, but downright unsafe. And yet the underlying idea that women going about their lives are putting on some sort of detached performance persists.
According to the video description on YouTube, Whistling Wood International wanted to make an ad empowering women as part of the celebration of 100 Years of Indian Cinema. Hopefully it has a big impact, and not just in India. Its the sort of message that needs to be heard everywhere.
http://www.bustle.com/articles/11005-indian-ad-turns-the-male-gaze-back-on-itself-and-its-awesome

cinnabonbon
(860 posts)with this ad. And the music too, for that matter.
I think I am going to watch it again.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)Thanks for posting.
BainsBane
(55,761 posts)Look at yourself. Of course for some, it would have no impact.
redqueen
(115,183 posts)I sure hope so but I'm sure no one will blame me for not holding my breath.
BainsBane
(55,761 posts)to post his in GD, if you can stand to.
redqueen
(115,183 posts)but at last count I think I had near 50 people ignoring me, so it might be better if someone less reviled did the honors.
BainsBane
(55,761 posts)You need to step up your game. I definitely don't fall into the less reviled category.
redqueen
(115,183 posts)
I'm doing it. Goddess knows it deserves a wider audience.

BainsBane
(55,761 posts)You know the fascination this group holds. What it won't get is discussion from the regulars.
redqueen
(115,183 posts)And if someone has me on ignore and misses it, I hope they'll see it after it goes viral.
BainsBane
(55,761 posts)We broke the internet with a little PSA. The things people find to stoke poutrage about.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)is they think they are taking us down. but to many people that do not particularly participate see the bullying and it creates more support.
each one of these battle reinforces what we are saying on du. and honestly, it feels like i am the sacrificial lamb to slaughter. that gets old.
BainsBane
(55,761 posts)Fitman continues his vendetta against you off site, and I recall your being quite patient with him. I refused to interact with him after the first post exchange and PM because I could see what he was.
Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)REASON FOR ALERT:
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS:
Bragging about causing a gender war in GD. This is group trolling and shit stirring. The way this group is being used is worse than anything that was ever done in Meta, and that was shut down.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Tue Dec 24, 2013, 06:09 PM, and the Jury voted 0-6 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: The snark is getting a little tiresome, and the women really aren't doing themselves (or the rest of us) any favors, but they didn't call anyone names.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: You need thicker skin. There's a lot of truth in the statement of fact. If it were an OP I might see your point but, no, nothing wrong with this post.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: I've no idea why anyone would alert on this. There's no TOS violation here.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: I don't see the issue. el_bryanto
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
BainsBane
(55,761 posts)Yea, posting a PSA from India is shit stirring. Whoever alerted ought to ask themselves what it means when they can't handle something designed for audiences in a developing country like India. The problem isn't that Redqueen posted the PSA in GD or that I first posted it in HOF. It's that a few people CHOOSE to stomp and pout about a basic message that harassing women isn't cool.
For the peanut gallery, the point was meant ironically. The idea that an India PSA is far too progressive and advanced for some around here says a great deal. Of course that post got about 130 recs, so clearly the vast majority found it useful. A couple of outliers, however, are outraged at the suggestion that men be expected to treat women as human beings. Well dear alerter, that really is your problem. I'ts 2013. Time to act like it.
Oh, and Merry Christmas to you too.
Thanks, Taz.
elias7
(4,221 posts)No?
BainsBane
(55,761 posts)The alert is there for everyone to see. The reason is obvious. It's alert stalking to try to get me to five hides and off the site.
Sheldon Cooper
(3,724 posts)Nope. Not at all.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)because there was a psa they did not like.
yes. i think that is about telling us. do not put up womens issues. or a push back. naked women.
and what do they do for a push back with race and gay issiues? because they do not want to be "educated"
i dare them
ismnotwasm
(42,624 posts)I just hid every single one of those threads because it's gotten so unbelievably stupid. Plus, the professional part of me recognizes the worst 'offenders' need professional help. Or something. Wonderful spouses or significant others notwithstanding.
One or two scare the crap out of me. I'm not even kidding
redqueen
(115,183 posts)+1,000,000,000,000
I think the responses would be interesting.
Warpy
(113,140 posts)Look downward.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)uncomfortable, self conscious. it is about THEM! fuck the women and worse GIRLS. gotta endoctrine the girls at 11 or 12 to know what is expected of them. they. do. not. care.
Warpy
(113,140 posts)But I love the ad for attempting to show creepers just how skeevy they look and why no woman ever returns the "favor."
BainsBane
(55,761 posts)
Iggo
(48,759 posts)Or something.
BainsBane
(55,761 posts)It's misandry, I think.
Iggo
(48,759 posts)Ug.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)allan01
(1,950 posts)
have stumbed accross some great vids like this on du

MyNameGoesHere
(7,638 posts)but I was surprised to hear the singer Sona Mahapatra, she is pretty well known in Bollywood movies. DU is pretty amazing for the message and the unexpected surprises.
Diego_Native 2012
(65 posts)This is a little over the top to make a point, I'm sure.
I can't imagine anyone is saying we should not see the opposite sex, ignore them, pretend they don't exist.
I mean, really, what's the end game here? A completely genderless society? Gender interaction only after establishing mutual permission via some as yet undetermined method? Isn't that what the Taliban proposes, different only in methodology?
And, let's face it, this checking out the opposite sex goes both ways. If you're saying you see a "threat" in a man looking at a woman, then the same should be true in reverse.
Honestly, if you don't want to be looked at or seen at all...stay home.
BainsBane
(55,761 posts)"Stay home." Amazingly, even if India men don't get to completely control public space, but we understand that is one of the chief goals of rape and sexual harassment.
ismnotwasm
(42,624 posts)
BainsBane
(55,761 posts)Diego_Native 2012
(65 posts)it never bothered me at all for gay men to check me out or ask me out. They have a right to find a partner and show their appreciation for beauty as much as heteros. Honestly, I think people leveling charges of "skeevy" intent are transferring their own feelings on others.
nomorenomore08
(13,324 posts)"Looking" is fine - everybody does it. But staring is rude and should be avoided.
Likewise, it's okay to flirt a little, but not if the person has made it clear they're not interested.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)entertainment. really dude. i do not believe that is my role for you in this lifetime.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)It's not that hard to figure out.
BainsBane
(55,761 posts)between looking and ogling, it's a deliberate choice.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)pathetic. men look like creeps when they look at a woman as a thing. it is obvious. we see. we know the creep. so, you keep it up dude, regardless how it makes women feel, cause nothing is going to register for you. when the woman is looking back at you, it is not out of interest, or desire, or like, she is looking at you in disgust....
Response to seabeyond (Reply #33)
Post removed
Sheldon Cooper
(3,724 posts)

ismnotwasm
(42,624 posts)
BainsBane
(55,761 posts)Are you implying that men are by nature predators, that they are incapable of behaving responsibly in society? What that video depicts is not typical men. It shows predators. It's sad that you can't tell the difference.
xulamaude
(847 posts)this is HoF - a group - and telling women to grow the fuck up is not exactly the kind of comment that is appreciated around here.
Bye.
xulamaude
(847 posts)Thank you jurors 1 thru 4.
MrScorpio
(73,759 posts)More of the same, please.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)walk up to the line at register. husband and wife, wife closest to me. he just got a glimpse before i got in line and i started watching. tried to inch backwards but could not get a look. started inching forward to look around wife. wife them looks out into the distance pretending she doesnt see. all the while inching, inching. and by the time he got to my eyes, he got a look full of "you are such a fuckin asshole".
so fuckin pathetic. so fuckin old. all the time. the girls/women there to entertain the men.
they look stupid. jsut plain fuckin stupid. and look them directly in the eyes, they look down or away. or get angry.
pansypoo53219
(22,083 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)as it defines their manhood at the expense.... once again, of the woman
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)
ismnotwasm
(42,624 posts)Again.
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)BainsBane
(55,761 posts)Most people like it. Then we have a few that think women should wear burkas.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)another, i forget. again. they didnt look good. then we are having all this fun in here. they dont like that..... this one was the explosion, with all the rec, the last straw.
and it is christmas all. tis the season. dont we know.
MuseRider
(34,546 posts)some crap in GD!
LeftyMom, I just replied to you. The best response ever, that I have ever seen anywhere for any reason. You are awesome!
I am going to have to wait until after Christmas to wade through the rest of that one.
One would have thought something this simple would make sense. I guess when your entitlement is threatened in such a basic way, oh what the fuck ever.
BainsBane
(55,761 posts)We have my friend and colleague Anna to thank for this video. She posted it on Facebook.
MuseRider
(34,546 posts)Here is the link. I thought it was pretty funny YMMV.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024214731#post39
Again sorry I did not link to it.
BainsBane
(55,761 posts)
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)i respect.
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)I've seen some misogynistic crap on DU in the past, but this bullshit in GD is just maddeningly, depressingly horrible.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)BainsBane
(55,761 posts)How can you show your face in public!
BainsBane
(55,761 posts)that suggests something isn't quite right with predatory behavior. Lord.