Baseball
Related: About this forumDiamond_Dog
(40,700 posts)Ive got Fellers autographed book and bobblehead.
Brother Buzz
(40,013 posts)Auggie
(33,192 posts)underpants
(196,694 posts)Single A Peninsula White Sox.
Thats also the site of the last professional appearance by Satchel Paige. On the Peninsula Greys roster that day but didnt catch was a rookie named Johnny Bench.
wysimdnwyg
(2,268 posts)In fifth grade, I wrote a book report on Fellers biography. The following summer, at one of the many minor league baseball games my father took me to, Feller was there for some reason (likely just a paid appearance). During the game, I spotted him walking by and ran down to get his autograph. After telling him about my book report, he sat with us for a few minutes and chatted. Nothing important that I remember, but for an eleven year old baseball fan, it was a moment Ill never forget.
ProfessorGAC
(76,893 posts)I simply don't believe that number.
Clearly he was the fastest of his time but 107 is not credible.
The way he got the number is also questionable math. Plus, I simply don't believe the 117 mph starting value.
Wind resistance against a rotating sphere of that size doesn't decelerate the ball 19mph in 0.4 seconds. My calculations suggest it would approach 19mph with laminar aur flow. But, sheer velocity t takes the fluid characteristics out of laminar state, and the ball us spinning at over 2,000rpm with raised seems. U value estimates to 2 or 3 thousand.
There is insufficient mass of air.
Was he incredibly fast? You bet.
But, with the bat weights of hitters not doing weight training in those days, nobody ever would have caught up to a 107mph fastball.
Most guys in MLB today can't and they're using bats 3 to 5 ounces lighter & they all weight train year round.
This feels like YouTube click bait.
Not credible.
BootinUp
(51,402 posts)ProfessorGAC
(76,893 posts)It's just scientifically lacking.