MAGAs
Cannot Have
Our Rights.
We Are Still
Using
Them
Go
GAVIN!!!
POWER
TO
THE PEOPLE!!

MUSEUM
Not a
Psychic
Tea Room
DJT Idiot!
woe:
Information
is Dear
but
Mis-info
is Free
all the stickies
on Grovelbot's
Big Board!
Photography
Related: About this forum
Easterncedar
(4,834 posts)It makes me want, for the first time, to learn the names of all those features I can see so clearly now. Thanks for the wonderful sight!
Mousetoescamper
(6,471 posts)
riverbendviewgal
(4,365 posts)Such an awesome photo. Than you for sharing.
Mousetoescamper
(6,471 posts)
KS Toronado
(21,093 posts)

Mousetoescamper
(6,471 posts)
John1956PA
(4,371 posts)Is the image rotated ninety degrees clockwise?
Mousetoescamper
(6,471 posts)The image isn't rotated.
John1956PA
(4,371 posts)
The discrepancy in rotation between the two images seems to be 90 degrees.
Mousetoescamper
(6,471 posts)My photo was taken at 12:13 AM today.
John1956PA
(4,371 posts)The orientation of the lunarscape in my photo is about 45 degrees counterclockwise from the orientation shown in the above image from Fourmilab. I think that the Fourmilab image shows the moon as it appeared on midnight on December 12.
Mousetoescamper
(6,471 posts)What's your point with this exercise? What do you require?
CaliforniaPeggy
(154,836 posts)Words fail me.
I've never seen the moon at this angle before. It looks so spherical, so luminous. I am gobsmacked!
Mousetoescamper
(6,471 posts)The sky was clear and the moon was nearly full (coming Dec. 15). I don't usually try to shoot this phase because it lacks the shadows that make the craters and mountains pop. As an experiment I matched the exposure time to the ISO. The photo turned out better than expected.
ISO 100 (my usual setting for the moon)
f16
1/100 sec